Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39309

in Meridian, MississippiPopulation 335

59.45/ 100

Ranked #5,245 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #4 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 1.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

15.9%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

14.8%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

1.0%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

2.2%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

0.60%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

3.5%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

2.6%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

43.5%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

21.7%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 39309, one of several in Meridian, Mississippi lands in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,245th) and the top 1.0% of Mississippi (4th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled high cholesterol lands in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and transportation noise sits at the national minimum. Modeled arsenic is in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and self-care disability settles in the bottom 0.4% nationally. Modeled obesity resides in the bottom 8.4% nationally. Unemployment registers at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Set against that, slow internet speeds stands at the national maximum, modeled loneliness lies in the top 1.0% nationally, and modeled binge drinking lands in the top 2.1% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. This ZIP stands out as the strongest overall among its immediate neighbors.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.2%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Disability

in the top 0.3%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults5.7%4.7–6.8
High blood pressure among adults14.8%12.2–17.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults1.1%0.9–1.2
Current asthma among adults8.9%7.7–10.1
Coronary heart disease among adults1.0%0.9–1.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults1.9%1.5–2.3
Depression among adults21.8%18.3–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults2.2%1.9–2.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened15.9%13.3–18.7
Obesity among adults26.6%21.3–32.2
Stroke among adults0.6%0.5–0.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.9%8.3–14.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure34.8%30.0–40.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults70.4%65.7–75.0
Cholesterol screening among adults72.6%68.2–77.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.9%64.7–76.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults10.9%9.3–12.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.7%18.0–25.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.7%6.5–11.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.5%15.3–24.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%30.1–40.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.5%10.1–15.4
Frequent mental distress among adults20.8%17.6–24.0
Frequent physical distress among adults7.5%6.2–8.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.6%16.2–23.4
Any disability among adults27.6%22.7–32.8
Hearing disability among adults2.6%2.2–3.1
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.1–9.3
Mobility disability among adults3.5%2.8–4.3
Self-care disability among adults1.3%1.1–1.6
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.0–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.0%23.4–32.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%12.6–21.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.7%4.8–8.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%9.9–15.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.2–14.0
Loneliness among adults43.5%37.9–49.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.5–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–649.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population11.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age20.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.6 yr ± 0.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.83 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured