ZIP code
58076
in Wahpeton, North DakotaPopulation 427
58.56/ 100
Ranked #5,940 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)
Ranked #58 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (top 16%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
11.4%
in the bottom 0.04% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
30.6%
in the top 0.06% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
8.8%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
1.1%
in the bottom 0.09% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
0.70%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Stroke
0.40%
in the bottom 0.10% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
2.2%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Walkability
350 intersections/sq mi
in the top 0.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
2.4%
in the bottom 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
60%
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, ZIP 58076, one of several in Wahpeton, North Dakota lands in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,940th) and the top 16% of North Dakota (58th).
A number of measures mark what daily life looks like here: modeled binge drinking is in the top 0.06% nationally, and slow internet speeds settles in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled loneliness resides in the top 2.0% nationally, and distance to a community health center registers in the top 2.2% nationally. Modeled fine-particle rests in the top 2.7% nationally, and distance to an emergency room stands in the top 2.9% nationally. On the brighter side, walkability lies in the top 0.5% nationally, modeled disaster risk lands in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and modeled transportation noise sits at the national minimum. Modeled obesity is in the bottom 4.1% nationally.
Set beside the nearby areas, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 58018, about 12 miles away, ranks better overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.3%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 79%
11%
Disability
healthier than 97%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 85%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 35%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 27%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 3%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 10%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 1%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.00%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 95%
11%
Disability
healthier than 99%
7%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 43%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 57%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 16%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 2%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 2%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 16%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
58075
North Dakotashares a border
Score 50.51
Closest healthier
58018
North Dakotaabout 12 mi away
Score 61.00
Similar health profile
58405
North Dakota99% similar profile
Score 60.05
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 3.9% | 3.1–4.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 8.8% | 6.8–10.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 0.8% | 0.7–1.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.4% | 8.8–12.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 0.7% | 0.6–1.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 1.4% | 0.8–2.2 |
| Depression among adults | 26.4% | 21.7–31.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 1.1% | 0.9–1.4 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 11.4% | 9.4–13.7 |
| Obesity among adults | 23.9% | 18.0–30.1 |
| Stroke among adults | 0.4% | 0.3–0.5 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 3.3% | 2.6–4.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.0% | 4.8–13.7 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 19.0% | 15.8–22.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 62.1% | 55.9–67.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 60.4% | 51.1–68.3 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 61.4% | 57.3–65.4 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 59.4% | 55.6–63.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 30.6% | 25.7–36.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 5.8% | 2.8–9.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 14.7% | 9.4–21.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 30.7% | 25.7–36.1 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 10.3% | 6.7–15.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 20.6% | 15.3–25.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 6.5% | 4.6–8.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 18.7% | 12.8–25.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 25.0% | 17.6–33.9 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 2.4% | 1.8–3.1 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.4% | 4.7–11.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 2.2% | 1.5–3.4 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 0.9% | 0.6–1.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 2.8% | 2.0–4.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.1% | 17.3–29.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.3% | 6.3–19.0 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 4.7% | 2.3–8.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.2% | 5.0–12.0 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.0% | 5.9–13.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 41.9% | 35.1–49.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.3% | 2.8–5.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ND median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 6.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 24.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 8.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 1.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 1.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 15.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 59.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 21.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383 |
| Median age | 19.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $767 ($513–$1,222) n=212 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ND median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.1 yr ± 1.44 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.44 years of 77.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured