Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68849

in Kearney, NebraskaPopulation 1,385

54.09/ 100

Ranked #10,577 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #278 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

11.1%

in the bottom 0.03% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

10.1%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

58.3%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

45%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

1.5%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

0.80%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

0.50%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

24.2%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

3.0%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

2.4%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 68849, one of several in Kearney, Nebraska, in overall standing, comes out in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,577th) and the top 49% of Nebraska (278th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: fatal road crashes settles at the national minimum, and modeled self-care disability lands in the bottom 0.4% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled mammography rests in the bottom 0.6% nationally, colon screening settles in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and binge drinking lands in the top 0.7% nationally. Slow internet speeds rests in the top 0.7% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 1.1% nationally. Modeled loneliness lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and tree cover rests at the national minimum. Modeled cognitive disability settles in the top 6.0% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 68845, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.4%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.9%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.00%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.3%

13%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.7%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults4.1%3.3–4.8
High blood pressure among adults10.1%8.4–11.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults0.7%0.6–0.9
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.3–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults0.8%0.6–0.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults1.9%1.2–2.7
Depression among adults24.4%20.5–28.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults1.5%1.2–1.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened11.1%9.4–13.0
Obesity among adults28.3%23.3–33.3
Stroke among adults0.5%0.4–0.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.8%7.5–16.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure21.0%17.3–24.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults66.1%61.4–70.7
Cholesterol screening among adults59.1%51.6–65.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years45.0%39.2–50.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.3%61.7–68.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years58.3%48.1–67.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults24.2%20.6–28.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.1%4.4–10.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.7%15.0–27.1
Short sleep duration among adults29.1%24.2–33.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.7%9.3–18.0
Frequent mental distress among adults23.8%18.5–27.4
Frequent physical distress among adults8.1%6.0–10.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.0%15.3–27.0
Any disability among adults27.4%21.0–34.5
Hearing disability among adults2.4%1.9–2.8
Independent living disability among adults9.6%6.5–13.5
Mobility disability among adults3.0%2.1–4.1
Self-care disability among adults1.3%0.9–1.7
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.1–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%19.1–29.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.1%13.1–29.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.4%6.4–18.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%7.8–15.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.1%9.1–16.9
Loneliness among adults43.1%36.4–49.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%4.9–9.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–648.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)9.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population4.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age19.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 1.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.70 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured