Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

87523

in Cordova, New MexicoPopulation 389

44.40/ 100

Ranked #23,010 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #202 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Vision disability

13.8%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

26.9%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

22.6%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.3%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

36.3%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

64.3%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

26.4%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

48.1%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

9.9%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Cordova, New Mexico (ZIP 87523) lands in the bottom 28% nationally (23,010th) and the bottom 40% of New Mexico (202nd).

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled vision disability resides in the top 0.9% nationally, and uninsured lands in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled diabetes registers in the top 1.3% nationally, and self-care disability sits in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the top 1.9% nationally, poverty is in the top 0.8% nationally, and modeled mobility disability stands in the top 2.0% nationally. Home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 1.4% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled binge drinking lies in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 2.1% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 87522, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.9%27.2–34.7
High blood pressure among adults41.9%37.4–46.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.1%6.3–8.1
Current asthma among adults9.0%7.8–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults10.8%9.3–12.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.4–9.4
Depression among adults18.6%15.4–22.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults22.6%19.4–25.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%34.4–43.8
Obesity among adults42.7%35.2–50.6
Stroke among adults5.7%4.9–6.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.5%9.2–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years26.9%21.4–33.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%76.4–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.7%68.5–76.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.5%82.0–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.1%53.6–64.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.2%58.5–66.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.9%69.8–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults9.9%7.9–12.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.0%10.5–15.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.5%33.0–46.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%26.4–38.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults36.3%31.1–41.7
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%12.6–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults20.3%17.4–23.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.7%15.0–20.8
Any disability among adults46.1%40.2–51.8
Hearing disability among adults12.4%10.7–14.2
Independent living disability among adults12.4%10.5–14.7
Mobility disability among adults26.4%22.4–30.6
Self-care disability among adults8.3%6.9–9.9
Vision disability among adults13.8%11.8–16.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.4%21.2–29.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults32.4%26.6–38.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults27.3%22.0–32.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.7%18.9–26.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.0%12.6–17.6
Loneliness among adults32.9%27.7–38.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.6%13.1–18.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate64.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–64100.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)13.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription48.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)51.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population12.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households34.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+35.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age15.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$23,395$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 2.2178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.21 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured