Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

88034

in Faywood, New MexicoPopulation 28

44.54/ 100

Ranked #22,863 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #201 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Coronary heart disease

18.3%

in the top 0.05% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

19.6%

in the top 0.04% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

27.6%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

8.4%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

13.1%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

6.6%

in the bottom 0.05% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

30.7%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.7%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

56.4%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

36.5%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Faywood, New Mexico (ZIP 88034), overall, ranks in the bottom 29% nationally (22,863rd) and the bottom 40% of New Mexico (201st).

continue reading

Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: modeled coronary heart disease settles in the top 0.05% nationally, hearing disability is in the top 0.04% nationally, and diabetes sits in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled stroke lands in the top 0.2% nationally, vision disability lies in the top 1.2% nationally, and mobility disability stands in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled self-care disability rests in the top 1.7% nationally, and high blood pressure registers in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health resides in the top 1.8% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled binge drinking settles in the bottom 0.05% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. ZIP 88041, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults43.2%38.7–47.8
High blood pressure among adults56.4%51.6–61.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.9%11.5–14.4
Current asthma among adults8.5%7.4–9.8
Coronary heart disease among adults18.3%16.1–20.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.7%10.5–15.2
Depression among adults17.3%14.5–20.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults27.6%24.0–31.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened49.4%44.3–54.7
Obesity among adults35.5%28.3–43.4
Stroke among adults8.4%7.3–9.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.5%15.1–22.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years20.7%15.4–27.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure87.3%84.7–89.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%77.8–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults91.6%90.0–93.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.7%59.1–70.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.9%53.1–60.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.0%59.7–76.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults6.6%5.3–8.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%10.8–16.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.4%33.3–45.8
Short sleep duration among adults28.9%23.9–34.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults36.5%31.4–42.0
Frequent mental distress among adults11.3%9.8–13.0
Frequent physical distress among adults21.7%18.7–24.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%11.7–16.3
Any disability among adults48.4%42.7–54.2
Hearing disability among adults19.6%17.3–22.1
Independent living disability among adults12.0%10.2–14.1
Mobility disability among adults30.7%26.3–35.4
Self-care disability among adults8.7%7.4–10.3
Vision disability among adults13.1%11.2–15.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%17.7–25.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.2%17.6–26.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.5%16.1–25.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.5–15.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.2–11.8
Loneliness among adults27.9%23.3–32.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.1–11.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.7 yr ± 2.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.74 years of 83.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured