ZIP code
88336
in Hondo, New MexicoPopulation 421
46.11/ 100
Ranked #21,226 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)
Ranked #176 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 48%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
39.3 mi
in the top 1.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST88thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Walkability
0.77 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 1.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST6thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
22.7 mi
in the top 2.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST78thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
10 per million
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
9.8%
in the top 5.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST74thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
12.3%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST80thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
19.6%
in the top 4.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
11.3%
in the top 3.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
63.2%
in the bottom 3.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST18thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Humid extreme heat
6 days/year
in the bottom 3.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST27thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›The read
Hondo, New Mexico (ZIP 88336), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 34% nationally (21,226th) and the bottom 48% of New Mexico (176th).
The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: walkability rests in the bottom 1.8% nationally, and distance to a nursing home resides in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled vision disability is in the top 5.3% nationally, and hearing disability lands in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled diabetes stands in the top 4.4% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease registers in the top 3.3% nationally, and home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 3.6% nationally. On the stronger side, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits in the top 1.2% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and modeled humid heat rests in the bottom 3.8% nationally.
Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 88338, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.2%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 77%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 82%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 97%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 21%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 13%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 15%
13%
Disability
healthier than 8%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 6%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 98%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 66%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 76%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 66%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 55%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 25%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 34%
16%
Disability
healthier than 27%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 10%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
88324
New Mexicoshares a border
Score 45.60
Closest healthier
88338
New Mexicoshares a border
Score 51.10
Similar health profile
87012
New Mexico97% similar profile
Score 45.32
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 33.1% | 29.4–37.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 44.7% | 40.2–49.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.2% | 8.3–10.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.4% | 8.2–10.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 11.3% | 9.9–12.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.2% | 7.8–10.9 |
| Depression among adults | 20.7% | 17.4–24.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 19.6% | 16.9–22.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 40.5% | 35.9–45.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 34.2% | 27.2–42.1 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.6% | 5.0–6.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 12.2% | 9.8–14.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 18.6% | 14.6–23.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 80.7% | 77.3–83.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 74.2% | 70.0–78.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.4% | 85.1–89.3 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 59.9% | 54.0–65.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 58.4% | 54.4–62.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 68.7% | 60.0–76.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 11.0% | 8.9–13.5 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 14.3% | 11.6–17.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 33.0% | 27.3–39.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 32.4% | 26.1–38.8 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 31.1% | 26.6–36.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.5% | 12.6–16.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.4% | 16.7–22.2 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.8% | 13.3–18.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 41.4% | 35.8–47.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 12.3% | 10.8–13.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.7% | 9.2–12.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.7% | 19.4–26.4 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.9% | 5.9–7.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 9.8% | 8.5–11.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.1% | 21.2–29.3 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 23.6% | 19.4–28.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 19.4% | 15.6–23.7 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.4% | 14.5–20.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 11.3% | 9.6–13.3 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.8% | 27.8–38.2 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 11.8% | 9.9–13.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NM median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 33.3% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 11.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 12.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 6.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 5.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347 |
| Broadband subscription | 63.2% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 83.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 39.7% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 18.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347 |
| Homeownership rate | 96.7% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347 |
| Foreign-born population | 1.2% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352 |
| Single-parent households | 90.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339 |
| Population 65+ | 48.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352 |
| Median age | 63.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 45.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265 |
| Median home value | $290,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $917 ($549–$1,408) n=173 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NM median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 83.1 yr ± 2.16 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.16 years of 83.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured