Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

87499

in Farmington, New MexicoPopulation 903

22.22/ 100

Ranked #31,731 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.1%)

Ranked #325 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 3.6%)

Ranked #12 of 16 Farmington, NM ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Vision disability

16.5%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

52.9%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

19.9%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

17.6%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

8.6%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

42.4%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

10.5%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

41.9%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

31.7%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

24.4%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its severe level: severe means at least four of the six health-need readings and at least four of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Households with no vehicle
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

Overall, ZIP 87499, one of several in Farmington, New Mexico lands in the bottom 1.1% nationally (31,731st) and the bottom 3.6% of New Mexico (325th).

continue reading

On the ground, a handful of readings define this area: modeled vision disability rests in the top 0.2% nationally, and mammography stands in the bottom 0.2% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lies in the top 0.2% nationally, and hearing disability lands in the top 0.08% nationally. Modeled stroke sits in the top 0.2% nationally, tooth loss is in the top 0.3% nationally, and self-care disability settles in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health resides in the top 0.4% nationally, mobility disability registers in the top 0.3% nationally, and diabetes rests in the top 0.6% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, recreation runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 87313, just across the boundary, ranks better overall. The ZIP also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Farmington, NM metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 1.0%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.05%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.2%32.9–39.5
High blood pressure among adults45.0%41.2–48.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Current asthma among adults14.5%12.8–16.3
Coronary heart disease among adults13.7%12.2–15.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults15.8%13.7–18.1
Depression among adults23.4%20.2–26.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults24.4%21.7–27.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.3%32.5–39.9
Obesity among adults41.2%35.4–46.9
Stroke among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years42.4%37.3–47.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.9%12.0–18.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%74.5–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.1%68.4–75.7
Cholesterol screening among adults79.1%76.4–81.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years50.8%46.3–55.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults45.0%41.7–48.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years52.9%45.3–60.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.4%8.5–12.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults32.6%28.4–37.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.3%32.3–42.2
Short sleep duration among adults41.5%37.3–46.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults41.9%37.4–46.6
Frequent mental distress among adults22.3%19.8–24.8
Frequent physical distress among adults26.5%23.5–29.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults25.0%21.9–28.3
Any disability among adults55.2%50.5–59.9
Hearing disability among adults17.6%15.7–19.5
Independent living disability among adults19.9%17.5–22.5
Mobility disability among adults31.7%28.1–35.2
Self-care disability among adults10.5%9.1–11.9
Vision disability among adults16.5%14.5–18.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults33.1%29.2–37.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults44.6%39.4–49.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults43.3%38.1–49.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.2%25.6–33.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults25.4%22.4–28.7
Loneliness among adults39.5%35.1–44.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults25.9%23.0–29.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347
Uninsured 18–6449.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339
No HS diploma (25+)30.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350
Unemployment rate (16+)6.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339
Households without a vehicle14.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347
Broadband subscription10.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)5.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347
Homeownership rate88.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352
Single-parent households39.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339
Population 65+20.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352
Median age46.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339
Median household income$40,662$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265
Median home value$82,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255
Median gross rent$1,113$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$917 ($549–$1,408) n=173
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NM median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.8 yr ± 0.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 75.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured