ZIP code
87410
in Aztec, New MexicoPopulation 15,012
45.11/ 100
Ranked #22,289 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)
Ranked #189 of 337 New Mexico ZIPs (bottom 44%)
Ranked #3 of 16 Farmington, NM ZIPs (top 19%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Mammography
62.6%
in the bottom 1.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST13thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
73.9%
in the bottom 8.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST30thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
2.4 mi
in the bottom 12.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST9thUS12thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›The read
Aztec, New Mexico (ZIP 87410), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 30% nationally (22,289th) and the bottom 44% of New Mexico (189th).
The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled humid heat registers in the bottom 11.1% nationally, and elder services settles in the top 12.3% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking lies in the bottom 14.7% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled mammography rests in the bottom 1.4% nationally, home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 8.9% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site is in the bottom 12.3% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lands in the top 12.9% nationally, colon screening stands in the bottom 12.5% nationally, and transportation registers in the top 16% nationally.
Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 87402, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Farmington, NM metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Risk Behavior
healthier than 69%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 88%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 53%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 46%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 49%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 11%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 6%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 35%
8%
Disability
healthier than 21%
7%
Lifting this score
Healthcare Access
healthier than 67%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 55%
21%
Preventive Care
healthier than 41%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 42%
11%
Disability
healthier than 49%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 46%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 32%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 19%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 27%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 87%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 80%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 73%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 80%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 80%
8%
Disability
healthier than 87%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 80%
5%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 53%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 20%
14%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
87401
New Mexicoshares a border
Score 42.17
Closest healthier
87402
New Mexicoshares a border
Score 55.22
Similar health profile
83320
Idaho96% similar profile
Score 43.28
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 27.9% | 25.0–30.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 33.1% | 29.7–36.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.1% | 7.4–8.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.1% | 9.8–12.4 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.8% | 7.1–8.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.8% | 7.9–9.8 |
| Depression among adults | 23.7% | 20.6–27.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 12.6% | 11.1–14.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 33.5% | 30.1–37.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 33.0% | 27.9–38.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.3% | 3.9–4.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 20.3% | 17.4–23.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 12.5% | 10.9–14.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 74.2% | 70.9–77.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 70.1% | 66.3–73.8 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 82.3% | 80.2–84.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 59.4% | 55.1–63.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 58.0% | 54.8–61.4 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 62.6% | 55.7–69.4 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.1% | 10.8–15.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.0% | 14.7–19.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 24.6% | 21.1–28.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 34.9% | 30.9–39.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 24.1% | 21.4–26.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.1% | 16.1–20.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.9% | 15.1–18.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.8% | 15.9–19.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 37.3% | 33.5–41.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.5% | 8.5–10.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.0% | 9.9–12.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 16.6% | 14.7–18.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.4% | 4.9–5.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.1% | 6.5–7.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.8% | 21.7–28.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 20.1% | 17.9–22.7 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 18.7% | 16.5–21.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 15.8% | 13.9–18.0 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 11.4% | 10.2–12.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 35.7% | 31.6–40.2 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 12.4% | 11.0–14.0 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NM median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 20.1% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.0% (0.0–39.0%) n=347 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 12.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 12.5% (0.0–35.5%) n=339 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 11.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.2% (0.0–28.5%) n=350 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 17.2% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.3% (0.0–51.7%) n=350 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 5.7% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.8% (0.0–15.2%) n=339 |
| Households without a vehicle | 3.6% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–12.4%) n=347 |
| Broadband subscription | 73.9% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 83.1% (53.2–100.0%) n=347 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 29.3% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 18.6% (0.0–41.4%) n=347 |
| Homeownership rate | 76.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.2% (59.9–100.0%) n=347 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.4% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.4% (0.0–11.2%) n=347 |
| Foreign-born population | 2.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–15.7%) n=352 |
| Single-parent households | 54.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (28.8–100.0%) n=339 |
| Population 65+ | 19.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.8% (7.9–55.9%) n=352 |
| Median age | 41.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 45.0 yr (31.2–67.3) n=339 |
| Median household income | $55,189 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,329 ($33,023–$90,174) n=265 |
| Median home value | $193,200 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $185,100 ($77,100–$382,920) n=255 |
| Median gross rent | $731 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $917 ($549–$1,408) n=173 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NM median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 78.9 yr ± 0.88 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.5 yr (76.1–83.2) n=357 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured