Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

86031

in Indian Wells, ArizonaPopulation 1,818

16.51/ 100

Ranked #32,003 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 0.2%)

Ranked #392 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 0.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Vision disability

19.5%

in the top 0.05% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

52.6%

in the top 0.04% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

48.7%

in the bottom 0.02% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

21.4%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

11.8%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

9.1%

in the top 0.07% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

18.1%

in the top 0.07% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

40.1%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

43.2%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

28.1%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its severe level: severe means at least four of the six health-need readings and at least four of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People without health insurance
  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Households with no vehicle
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

By the composite measure, Indian Wells, Arizona (ZIP 86031) sits in the bottom 0.2% nationally (32,003rd) and the bottom 0.6% of Arizona (392nd).

continue reading

What the data shows most clearly about this place comes first: modeled vision disability stands in the top 0.05% nationally, tooth loss is in the top 0.04% nationally, and mammography rests in the bottom 0.02% nationally. Modeled independent living disability sits in the top 0.08% nationally, self-care disability registers in the top 0.2% nationally, and stroke lands in the top 0.07% nationally. Modeled hearing disability resides in the top 0.07% nationally, and colon screening lies in the bottom 0.2% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health settles in the top 0.2% nationally, and cognitive disability stands in the top 0.3% nationally.

ZIP 86032, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. This ZIP also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.9%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.2%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 1.0%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 99.1 (top 1%); chronic-disease standing 0.6 (bottom 1%) — 99 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #3 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.6%34.0–39.4
High blood pressure among adults49.3%46.3–52.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.5–9.0
Current asthma among adults17.2%15.5–19.0
Coronary heart disease among adults13.7%12.5–15.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults18.3%16.5–20.2
Depression among adults24.0%21.3–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults24.7%22.4–27.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%34.4–40.7
Obesity among adults46.4%41.6–51.4
Stroke among adults9.1%8.4–10.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years52.6%47.9–57.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.8%14.8–21.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.2%73.6–78.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.6%68.2–74.6
Cholesterol screening among adults76.1%73.4–78.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years40.1%35.7–44.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults35.0%31.9–38.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years48.7%41.1–55.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.0%8.4–11.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults33.5%29.9–37.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.1%35.0–43.2
Short sleep duration among adults42.8%38.1–47.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults43.2%39.5–46.9
Frequent mental distress among adults24.2%21.8–26.5
Frequent physical distress among adults26.5%24.0–29.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults28.1%25.4–30.8
Any disability among adults56.1%52.3–59.7
Hearing disability among adults18.1%16.6–19.7
Independent living disability among adults21.4%19.2–23.5
Mobility disability among adults32.6%29.8–35.4
Self-care disability among adults11.8%10.7–13.0
Vision disability among adults19.5%17.8–21.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults37.9%34.2–41.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults49.7%45.3–54.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults46.1%41.9–50.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.9%28.6–35.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults29.2%26.4–32.2
Loneliness among adults36.4%32.8–40.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults27.1%24.5–30.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate45.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–6414.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)31.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)2.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)14.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle19.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription38.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate72.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)21.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households33.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+20.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age39.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$32,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$80,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$871$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.1 yr ± 0.4578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.45 years of 75.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured