Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31058

in Mauk, GeorgiaPopulation 1,929

36.52/ 100

Ranked #28,748 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.4%)

Ranked #639 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 10.2%)

Ranked #32 of 36 Columbus, GA-AL ZIPs (bottom 11.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

20.6 mi

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25.2%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

71.1%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.6%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.6%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

28.2%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.1%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

69%

in the bottom 10.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$40,655

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Mauk, Georgia (ZIP 31058), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 10.4% nationally (28,748th) and the bottom 10.2% of Georgia (639th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: modeled arsenic lies in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Set against that, distance to an emergency room settles in the top 5.1% nationally, and modeled tooth loss registers in the top 7.0% nationally. Home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 6.8% nationally, and modeled self-care disability lands in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled independent living disability is in the top 8.4% nationally, and poverty resides in the top 8.1% nationally. Modeled energy burden rests in the top 8.4% nationally, and mammography lies in the bottom 10.4% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 31801, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Columbus, GA-AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 81.2; chronic-disease standing 12.5 — 69 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,143 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.5%29.5–35.3
High blood pressure among adults43.9%40.4–47.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.7–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.9%10.4–13.4
Depression among adults22.8%19.9–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.3%15.4–19.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.5%38.8–46.0
Obesity among adults38.5%32.0–44.9
Stroke among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.2%22.5–28.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.5%13.1–18.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.9–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%75.0–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.4%82.5–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.8%54.4–62.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.0%44.9–51.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.0%62.2–75.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.7–16.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.5%18.6–24.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.0%29.6–38.4
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%33.0–43.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.3%25.0–31.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.5–21.4
Frequent physical distress among adults18.7%16.7–20.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.8%16.6–21.0
Any disability among adults38.9%34.8–43.1
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.7–10.6
Independent living disability among adults12.6%11.3–14.1
Mobility disability among adults20.8%18.4–23.2
Self-care disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Vision disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.3%21.3–27.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.6%19.6–25.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.1%18.4–24.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.9%13.9–18.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.3–13.1
Loneliness among adults36.5%32.1–40.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.8–12.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6413.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)21.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)8.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription71.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate78.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population10.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households62.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+22.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age50.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$40,655$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$85,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$332$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.9 yr ± 1.3078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.30 years of 75.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured