ZIP code
85930
in Mcnary, ArizonaPopulation 1,374
38.19/ 100
Ranked #27,903 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.0%)
Ranked #321 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 19%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Mammography
58%
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST12thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
47.7%
in the bottom 1.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST15thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
94.6%
in the top 0.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
16.2%
in the top 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Humid extreme heat
2.5 days/year
in the bottom 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS1stDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
28.4%
in the bottom 2.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
30.3 mi
in the top 2.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST90thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
19.7%
in the top 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
13.7%
in the top 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
111.7 mi
in the top 3.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Mcnary, Arizona (ZIP 85930) places in the bottom 13.0% nationally (27,903rd) and the bottom 19% of Arizona (321st), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled mammography sits in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and colon screening lies in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Slow internet speeds rests in the top 1.2% nationally, and modeled transportation resides in the top 2.3% nationally. Crowded housing is in the top 2.6% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled tree cover lands in the top 0.3% nationally, humid heat stands in the bottom 1.5% nationally, and high cholesterol registers in the bottom 2.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles in the top 2.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 3.0% nationally.
Beside the areas that surround it, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 85927, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental HazardPartial
in the top 0.5%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the top 0.2%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 53%
21%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 3%
16%
Preventive Care
in the bottom 0.9%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 23%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 14%
8%
Disability
healthier than 11%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 14%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental HazardPartial
healthier than 92%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the top 0.09%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 55%
21%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 12%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 9%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 17%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 11%
8%
Disability
healthier than 21%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 25%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
85927
Arizonashares a border
Score 54.08
Closest healthier
85935
Arizonashares a border
Score 59.89
Similar health profile
87417
New Mexico98% similar profile
Score 40.30
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 22.3% | 20.6–24.0 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 31.6% | 29.3–33.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 5.4% | 4.9–5.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 15.3% | 14.0–16.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 6.3% | 5.7–6.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.3% | 7.3–9.4 |
| Depression among adults | 22.0% | 19.8–24.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.3% | 12.0–14.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 28.4% | 26.4–30.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 36.6% | 32.7–40.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.2% | 3.8–4.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 25.5% | 22.2–28.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 12.3% | 10.2–14.8 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 67.9% | 65.6–70.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 67.7% | 64.8–70.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 75.6% | 72.9–78.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 47.7% | 44.1–51.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 45.5% | 42.8–48.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 58.0% | 51.9–63.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.2% | 12.4–16.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 21.5% | 18.8–24.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 24.4% | 21.6–27.5 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 41.3% | 37.5–45.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 26.6% | 23.8–29.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 22.6% | 20.6–24.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.2% | 15.5–18.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 21.8% | 19.4–24.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 40.0% | 36.6–43.8 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.5% | 8.7–10.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.5% | 11.1–14.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 16.2% | 14.6–18.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.3% | 4.7–5.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 9.6% | 8.7–10.8 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 36.9% | 33.7–40.3 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 32.3% | 28.1–36.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 24.0% | 20.4–27.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 23.3% | 20.4–26.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 19.7% | 17.4–22.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 37.1% | 34.0–40.4 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 17.2% | 15.2–19.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 24.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 37.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 12.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 5.6% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 12.2% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395 |
| Households without a vehicle | 13.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394 |
| Broadband subscription | 68.6% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 6.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394 |
| Homeownership rate | 59.6% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 76.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 13.7% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.7% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 7.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397 |
| Single-parent households | 21.6% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388 |
| Population 65+ | 4.4% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397 |
| Median age | 22.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394 |
| Median household income | $54,250 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371 |
| Median home value | $64,600 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363 |
| Median gross rent | $523 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.0 yr ± 1.58 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.58 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured