ZIP code
86411
in Hackberry, ArizonaPopulation 579
50.02/ 100
Ranked #16,224 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)
Ranked #205 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 48%)
Ranked #2 of 24 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ ZIPs (top 8.4%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Distance to an emergency room
42.8 mi
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›Mammography
64.6%
in the bottom 2.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST28thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
26.7%
in the bottom 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
10 per million
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
1.3%
in the bottom 3.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Walkability
1.4 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 4.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST8thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
88.2 mi
in the top 4.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST88thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
1.7%
in the bottom 6.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
11.5%
in the top 6.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST71stUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
1.8%
in the top 6.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST84thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›The read
By its overall health score, Hackberry, Arizona (ZIP 86411) lands in the bottom 49% nationally (16,224th) and the bottom 48% of Arizona (205th).
The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: distance to an emergency room registers in the top 1.0% nationally, and modeled mammography sits in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Walkability rests in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and modeled hearing disability is in the top 6.5% nationally. Slow internet speeds stands in the top 6.5% nationally. Better still, modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 2.3% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and housing-cost burden resides in the bottom 3.9% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 4.4% nationally, and poverty registers in the bottom 6.3% nationally.
To translate a couple of terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 86305, about 33 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 62%
16%
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.6%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 94%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 62%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 51%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 16%
21%
Preventive Care
healthier than 30%
13%
Disability
healthier than 35%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 7%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 91%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 65%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 87%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 76%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 58%
16%
Disability
healthier than 48%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 29%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 32%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 17%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 65%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 78%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 87%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 83%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 78%
11%
Mental Health
in the top 0.00%
8%
Disability
healthier than 96%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 83%
5%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 22%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
86401
Arizonashares a border
Score 47.95
Closest healthier
86305
Arizonaabout 33 mi away
Score 62.19
Similar health profile
69128
Nebraska93% similar profile
Score 48.22
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 34.8% | 31.2–38.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 44.3% | 40.4–48.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 13.7% | 12.3–15.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.4% | 9.1–11.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.2% | 8.8–11.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.7% | 8.8–12.8 |
| Depression among adults | 17.8% | 15.3–20.5 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.9% | 11.9–15.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 44.3% | 40.6–48.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 31.6% | 26.6–36.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.1% | 4.4–5.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 14.6% | 12.3–17.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.2% | 6.4–10.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 79.8% | 76.7–82.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 76.9% | 73.6–80.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 89.3% | 87.8–90.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 63.2% | 58.6–67.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 58.4% | 54.9–61.6 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 64.6% | 57.4–71.0 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.6% | 12.3–17.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 15.4% | 12.5–18.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 25.6% | 21.2–30.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.2% | 33.6–42.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 20.1% | 16.8–23.5 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 13.2% | 11.4–14.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 15.5% | 13.3–17.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.4% | 10.6–14.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 35.0% | 30.5–39.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.5% | 10.1–13.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.0% | 6.8–9.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 18.5% | 15.5–21.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.5% | 3.8–5.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.6% | 4.8–6.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.5% | 22.0–29.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.8% | 8.7–13.5 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 8.2% | 6.6–10.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.8% | 6.4–9.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.0% | 5.1–7.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 26.7% | 23.0–30.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.5% | 4.6–6.5 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 1.7% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 26.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 9.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394 |
| Broadband subscription | 96.5% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 1.3% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394 |
| Homeownership rate | 96.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 76.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 5.7% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 7.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397 |
| Single-parent households | 79.7% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388 |
| Population 65+ | 13.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397 |
| Median age | 40.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394 |
| Median household income | $67,697 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371 |
| Median home value | $146,100 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 78.5 yr ± 1.50 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.50 years of 78.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured