Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

86322

in Camp Verde, ArizonaPopulation 13,020

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

44.40/ 100

Ranked #23,011 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #270 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #24 of 27 Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ ZIPs (bottom 11.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

91%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

60.9%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST16th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Park land

91.2%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

70.9%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

67 µg/L

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

58.1%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST39th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Camp Verde, Arizona (ZIP 86322) ranks in the bottom 28% nationally (23,011th) and the bottom 31% of Arizona (270th).

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: modeled arsenic lands at the national maximum, and mammography sits in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled pfas is in the top 4.2% nationally, and lithium in drinking water settles in the top 7.0% nationally. Modeled hearing disability resides in the top 10.1% nationally, modeled colon screening registers in the bottom 9.5% nationally, and crowded housing rests in the top 13.5% nationally. On the brighter side, park land stands in the top 0.3% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 11.0% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, arsenic runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Close by, ZIP 85541, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.0%30.4–35.9
High blood pressure among adults37.9%34.9–41.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.2–12.3
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.1–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.9%9.6–12.5
Depression among adults21.1%18.5–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.4–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.8%36.7–43.1
Obesity among adults29.8%25.5–34.4
Stroke among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.7%15.0–20.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.3%11.2–15.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.1%74.3–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.5%71.3–77.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.3–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.1%54.0–62.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.9%49.7–56.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years60.9%54.1–67.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.3–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.4%14.1–18.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%22.7–29.7
Short sleep duration among adults35.3%31.3–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.6%21.9–27.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.6–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults17.3%15.4–19.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.4–18.2
Any disability among adults39.3%35.6–43.0
Hearing disability among adults10.9%9.7–12.1
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.0–11.4
Mobility disability among adults19.7%17.4–22.2
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Vision disability among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.6%23.6–29.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.4%14.9–19.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.8–16.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.9–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.3–10.7
Loneliness among adults30.4%26.9–33.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.1–9.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–6417.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)11.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription86.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate76.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households59.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+26.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age42.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$69,411$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$323,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$1,066$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 1.2078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.20 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured