Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

85539

in Miami, ArizonaPopulation 3,386

43.68/ 100

Ranked #23,723 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #279 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

63.1%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST21st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Park land

78.5%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

110 µg/L

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

29.9 mi

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.28 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.55 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

13.5%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

44.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.55 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Miami, Arizona (ZIP 85539) ranks in the bottom 26% nationally (23,723rd) and the bottom 29% of Arizona (279th).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled industrial-pollution burden lies at the national maximum, and mammography resides in the bottom 1.6% nationally. Lithium in drinking water lands in the top 1.9% nationally, and distance to an emergency room registers in the top 2.0% nationally. Unemployment sits in the top 4.9% nationally, and fatal road crashes rests in the top 5.5% nationally. On the encouraging side, park land is in the top 0.8% nationally, mental-health providers stands in the top 2.4% nationally, and pharmacy settles in the top 4.2% nationally. Outpatient lies in the top 6.4% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 85137, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.5%28.2–32.9
High blood pressure among adults35.9%33.3–38.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.4–9.9
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.6–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.7–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%8.1–9.8
Depression among adults20.5%18.2–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%13.4–16.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.6%35.8–41.5
Obesity among adults33.2%29.1–37.6
Stroke among adults4.5%4.2–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.7%15.0–20.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.7%14.7–18.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.5–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.9%72.0–77.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.4%82.7–86.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.9%53.6–62.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.6%48.2–55.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years63.1%56.2–69.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.6–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.5%12.8–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.4%26.5–32.8
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%30.9–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.3%23.0–27.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.9–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults16.9%15.4–18.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.9%15.3–18.6
Any disability among adults37.7%34.8–40.9
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.6–11.5
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.8–10.7
Mobility disability among adults18.6%16.9–20.4
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
Vision disability among adults7.9%7.3–8.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.2%26.3–32.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.8%18.6–23.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.2%13.4–17.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.1%13.4–17.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Loneliness among adults33.2%29.9–36.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–6412.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)8.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)13.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription77.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate75.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population4.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households42.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+21.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age42.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$47,807$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$137,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$906$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.0 yr ± 2.4978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.49 years of 84.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured