ZIP code
86313
in Prescott, ArizonaPopulation 149
39.61/ 100
Ranked #27,009 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)
Ranked #313 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (bottom 21%)
Ranked #27 of 27 Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ ZIPs (bottom 3.8%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Hearing disability
20%
in the top 0.04% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
16.1%
in the top 0.09% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Stroke
7.7%
in the top 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mammography
60.8%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST16thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
48.4%
in the bottom 1.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST16thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
10.7%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST84thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
26.3%
in the top 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
37.8 mi
in the top 1.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST93rdUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
50.5%
in the top 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›PFOA in drinking water
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.
Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.
Full methodology ›The read
On the composite measure, ZIP 86313, one of several in Prescott, Arizona stands in the bottom 16% nationally (27,009th) and the bottom 21% of Arizona (313th).
A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: modeled hearing disability rests in the top 0.04% nationally, and coronary heart disease lands in the top 0.09% nationally. Modeled stroke settles in the top 0.5% nationally, and mammography rests in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled colon screening lands in the bottom 1.5% nationally, vision disability settles in the top 3.5% nationally, and mobility disability rests in the top 2.1% nationally. Poverty lands in the top 1.6% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water settles at the national maximum. On the brighter side, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 1.3% nationally.
Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. ZIP 86301, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 97%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 97%
8%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 49%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 55%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 56%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 5%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 18%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 5%
13%
Disability
healthier than 3%
7%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 76%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 92%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 73%
5%
About typical
Healthcare Access
healthier than 55%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 11%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 24%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 30%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 30%
11%
Disability
healthier than 13%
7%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 81%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 85%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 73%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.00%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 0.00%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 4%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 4%
11%
Disability
in the bottom 0.00%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 19%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
86301
Arizonashares a border
Score 58.74
Closest healthier
86303
Arizonaabout 0.1 mi away
Score 59.20
Similar health profile
85618
Arizona98% similar profile
Score 39.76
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 35.6% | 32.2–38.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 47.5% | 43.9–50.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 13.2% | 11.5–14.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.2% | 8.0–10.4 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 16.1% | 13.3–19.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 12.8% | 9.6–16.9 |
| Depression among adults | 15.3% | 13.1–17.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 18.0% | 15.3–20.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 42.5% | 39.0–45.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 29.4% | 25.0–33.9 |
| Stroke among adults | 7.7% | 6.1–9.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 27.3% | 23.1–31.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 13.0% | 9.5–17.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 79.9% | 77.1–82.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 75.5% | 72.3–78.5 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 83.3% | 80.5–85.8 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 48.4% | 44.2–52.5 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 48.9% | 45.6–52.2 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 60.8% | 53.6–68.0 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.4% | 11.4–15.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.2% | 13.8–21.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 31.6% | 25.8–37.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 34.7% | 30.8–38.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 30.5% | 25.2–36.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 13.8% | 12.0–15.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.1% | 16.0–22.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.0% | 13.2–19.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 48.1% | 42.5–53.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 20.0% | 17.0–23.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.1% | 9.5–15.4 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 26.3% | 21.2–31.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 7.4% | 5.7–9.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 10.7% | 8.5–13.8 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 27.5% | 23.5–31.8 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 19.2% | 15.2–23.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 15.9% | 12.3–19.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.1% | 9.7–14.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 11.1% | 9.2–13.2 |
| Loneliness among adults | 28.0% | 24.4–32.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 9.5% | 7.8–11.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 50.5% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 26.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 10.1% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 37.6% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 76.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 7.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388 |
| Population 65+ | 28.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397 |
| Median age | 52.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 71.3 yr ± 1.49 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.49 years of 71.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured