Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30660

in Rayle, GeorgiaPopulation 1,040

45.13/ 100

Ranked #22,271 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #411 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Crowded housing

9.2%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.3%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97.1%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.4 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 10.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

12.7%

in the bottom 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.1%

in the top 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Rayle, Georgia (ZIP 30660) ranks in the bottom 31% nationally (22,271st) and the bottom 42% of Georgia (411th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: fiber broadband settles in the top 8.1% nationally, and modeled pfas lies in the bottom 10.3% nationally. Housing-cost burden resides in the bottom 13.5% nationally. Against that, crowded housing lands in the top 5.2% nationally, modeled diabetes registers in the top 7.2% nationally, and walkability sits in the bottom 10.3% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure rests in the top 9.8% nationally, stroke is in the top 10.1% nationally, and humid heat stands in the top 11.1% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol settles in the top 10.2% nationally.

In plainer terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 30627, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 89.5; chronic-disease standing 16.4 — 73 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #875 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.6%29.6–35.7
High blood pressure among adults46.0%42.3–49.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.6–10.1
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.6–11.2
Depression among adults19.3%16.8–22.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.3%16.3–20.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.1%39.4–47.0
Obesity among adults38.9%32.1–46.3
Stroke among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.2%14.5–20.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.0%11.8–16.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.3%80.3–84.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.3%77.6–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.3–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.5%61.1–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.6%50.3–57.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.9%65.7–79.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.9%10.9–15.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.8%14.5–19.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.8%28.2–37.4
Short sleep duration among adults37.6%31.6–43.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.9%23.0–29.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%15.1–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.9%15.1–18.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.8%14.1–17.8
Any disability among adults36.8%32.7–41.0
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.1
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.6–12.2
Mobility disability among adults20.0%17.7–22.4
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.6
Vision disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%20.6–27.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.5%16.7–22.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.8%14.3–19.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.4–16.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.9–11.5
Loneliness among adults35.3%30.7–40.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.6–11.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6422.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)13.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)4.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription85.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate87.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)9.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population6.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households58.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+17.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age43.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$54,234$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$107,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$465$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 1.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.65 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured