Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

85623

in Oracle, ArizonaPopulation 5,558

51.13/ 100

Ranked #14,622 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #182 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #100 of 159 Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

50.8%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.8%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.1%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Park land

41.9%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.0%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.4%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.4%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

The read

Oracle, Arizona (ZIP 85623), by its overall standing, sits in the top 46% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,622nd) and the top 46% of Arizona (182nd).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled binge drinking sits in the bottom 1.4% nationally, park land settles in the top 3.1% nationally, and mental-health providers registers in the top 4.2% nationally. Elder services stands in the top 7.1% nationally, and modeled loneliness lands in the bottom 7.3% nationally. By contrast, modeled high cholesterol is in the top 0.2% nationally, and hearing disability resides in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease rests in the top 4.3% nationally, and high blood pressure lies in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled diabetes sits in the top 7.0% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 85619, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 92.4 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 4.6 (bottom 10%) — 88 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #182 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.9%37.7–44.0
High blood pressure among adults48.4%45.1–51.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults15.0%13.7–16.4
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.6–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults11.0%9.8–12.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.0%9.2–13.0
Depression among adults18.5%16.2–21.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.4%16.2–20.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened50.8%47.4–54.3
Obesity among adults38.3%33.6–43.1
Stroke among adults5.5%4.9–6.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.4–12.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.5%9.3–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.0%82.6–87.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.0%80.6–85.1
Cholesterol screening among adults91.2%89.9–92.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.7%67.9–75.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.2%58.3–64.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.5%61.9–74.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.1%8.5–11.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.3–13.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.5%23.7–31.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.7%30.9–38.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.2%21.0–27.6
Frequent mental distress among adults12.9%11.4–14.4
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%15.1–19.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%11.2–14.9
Any disability among adults38.0%34.0–42.2
Hearing disability among adults12.8%11.4–14.3
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.3–9.8
Mobility disability among adults21.2%18.4–24.2
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.3–5.8
Vision disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.2%18.5–24.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.2–16.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.5–11.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.2–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Loneliness among adults28.0%24.8–31.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.2–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–6423.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)3.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)43.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription91.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate89.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population6.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households81.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+59.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age66.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$68,541$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$428,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.3 yr ± 2.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.78 years of 83.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured