Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30546

in Hiawassee, GeorgiaPopulation 8,096

51.44/ 100

Ranked #14,206 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #230 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.88%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Park land

59.7%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

47%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

84.2%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.2%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.0%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.2%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.6%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.1%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.4%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hiawassee, Georgia (ZIP 30546), by its composite score, sits in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,206th) and the top 32% of Georgia (230th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and park land is in the top 1.7% nationally. Modeled tree cover lands in the top 3.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking registers in the bottom 4.9% nationally, and pfas settles in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled high cholesterol sits in the top 1.5% nationally, coronary heart disease lies in the top 3.6% nationally, and hearing disability rests in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure resides in the top 5.7% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 28904, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 1.0%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 93.6 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 8.0 (bottom 10%) — 86 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #257 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.5%34.6–42.8
High blood pressure among adults48.2%43.6–52.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.2%12.9–15.6
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.5–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults11.2%10.0–12.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.8%9.4–12.3
Depression among adults20.1%17.0–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.3%15.0–19.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened47.0%42.2–51.8
Obesity among adults32.8%25.1–40.9
Stroke among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.6%14.6–20.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.1%8.3–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.9%83.5–88.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.5%80.4–86.2
Cholesterol screening among adults91.0%89.7–92.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.3%66.2–75.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.5%58.8–66.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.3%67.4–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.6%9.4–14.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.6%11.5–16.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.3%24.5–34.4
Short sleep duration among adults31.5%25.3–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.4%19.5–25.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%12.8–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults17.0%15.0–19.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.5–14.9
Any disability among adults36.7%32.2–41.6
Hearing disability among adults12.0%10.7–13.4
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.5–11.0
Mobility disability among adults20.4%17.7–23.3
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.9%15.9–22.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.4–13.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.7–11.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.9–9.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.4
Loneliness among adults31.5%26.5–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.7–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6428.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)6.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription88.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate84.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households77.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+41.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age61.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$59,234$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$295,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$919$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.0 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 77.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured