ZIP code
86327
in Dewey, ArizonaPopulation 12,154
52.91/ 100
Ranked #12,204 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)
Ranked #160 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (top 41%)
Ranked #10 of 27 Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ ZIPs (top 37%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Park land
69.4%
in the top 1.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST91stUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›Mammography
66%
in the bottom 4.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST35thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
12.2%
in the top 3.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST76thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
27.3%
in the bottom 4.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST13thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Loud transportation noise
2.5%
in the top 5.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
0.8 mi
in the bottom 6.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST3rdUS6thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Obesity
26.9%
in the bottom 8.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST12thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
10.3%
in the top 7.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST81stUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
12.2%
in the bottom 7.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST26thUS8thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Stroke
5.4%
in the top 8.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST77thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›The read
On balance, and by the composite measure, Dewey, Arizona (ZIP 86327) ranks in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,204th) and the top 41% of Arizona (160th).
Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: park land lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and modeled loneliness registers in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Modeled obesity sits in the bottom 8.9% nationally, and binge drinking rests in the bottom 7.9% nationally. On the other hand, modeled mammography is in the bottom 4.0% nationally, hearing disability stands in the top 3.8% nationally, and loud transportation noise settles in the top 5.4% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site lies in the bottom 6.4% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease resides in the top 7.7% nationally, and modeled stroke lands in the top 8.9% nationally.
Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 86303, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 76%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 92%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 92%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 78%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 63%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 59%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 54%
13%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 14%
21%
Disability
healthier than 29%
7%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 70%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 79%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 77%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 80%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 81%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 60%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 26%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 35%
14%
Disability
healthier than 39%
7%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 69%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 62%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 62%
11%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 73%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 77%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 54%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 23%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 23%
14%
Disability
healthier than 35%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
86303
Arizonashares a border
Score 59.20
Closest healthier
86315
Arizonashares a border
Score 58.66
Similar health profile
32118
Florida96% similar profile
Score 53.13
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 38.4% | 35.4–41.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 42.1% | 38.8–45.5 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 15.1% | 13.8–16.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.0% | 9.9–12.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.3% | 9.4–11.5 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.9% | 9.7–12.1 |
| Depression among adults | 19.1% | 16.7–21.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.5% | 11.9–15.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 44.1% | 40.7–47.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 26.9% | 23.0–31.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.4% | 4.9–5.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 13.4% | 11.3–15.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.9% | 7.6–10.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 81.9% | 79.2–84.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.9% | 77.2–82.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 90.6% | 89.5–91.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 67.1% | 63.2–70.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 63.4% | 60.4–66.4 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 66.0% | 59.6–72.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.2% | 10.3–14.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 12.2% | 10.6–13.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 23.6% | 20.6–26.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 31.0% | 27.3–34.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 21.2% | 18.9–23.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 13.1% | 11.7–14.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.2% | 14.5–18.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.5% | 11.1–13.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 37.6% | 34.3–41.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 12.2% | 11.0–13.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.6% | 7.6–9.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 19.8% | 17.8–22.2 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.6% | 4.2–5.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.9% | 5.4–6.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.2% | 20.5–26.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.6% | 9.2–12.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 8.3% | 7.0–9.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.6% | 6.6–8.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.0% | 5.3–6.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 27.3% | 24.2–30.5 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.0% | 4.4–5.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 12.3% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 7.4% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 7.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 21.8% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 6.8% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395 |
| Households without a vehicle | 2.4% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394 |
| Broadband subscription | 90.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 26.8% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394 |
| Homeownership rate | 91.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 76.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.8% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394 |
| Foreign-born population | 3.1% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 7.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397 |
| Single-parent households | 73.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388 |
| Population 65+ | 43.7% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397 |
| Median age | 61.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394 |
| Median household income | $71,512 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371 |
| Median home value | $392,400 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363 |
| Median gross rent | $1,540 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AZ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.5 yr ± 0.73 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–82.8) n=354 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.73 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured