Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

85379

in Surprise, ArizonaPopulation 51,035

59.27/ 100

Ranked #5,388 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #78 of 394 Arizona ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #52 of 159 Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outer-floodplain exposure

99%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

130.7 days/year

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

70 µg/L

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.4%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

27.6%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

110 intersections/sq mi

in the top 9.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.5%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 85379, one of several in Surprise, Arizona, overall, ranks in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,388th) and the top 20% of Arizona (78th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: lead in tap water lies at the national minimum, modeled coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure rests in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Fatal road crashes registers in the bottom 7.5% nationally, walkability resides in the top 9.7% nationally, and modeled stroke settles in the bottom 6.7% nationally. On the other side, outer-floodplain exposure is in the top 0.2% nationally, and modeled extreme heat sits in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled tree cover lands at the national minimum, and lithium in drinking water lies in the top 5.8% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". ZIP 85388, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.3%19.6–22.9
High blood pressure among adults27.6%25.6–29.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.6–7.7
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.5–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Depression among adults19.9%17.9–22.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.8%8.0–9.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.1%31.8–36.4
Obesity among adults30.0%26.7–33.5
Stroke among adults2.5%2.3–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.6%7.2–10.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.1%9.0–11.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.5%66.8–71.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.2%69.5–74.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.9–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.1%55.9–62.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.6%61.1–66.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.8%72.2–80.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.8%15.8–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.7%15.8–19.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%32.4–39.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.4%14.1–16.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%14.3–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults10.8%9.8–11.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%12.0–14.5
Any disability among adults26.0%23.8–28.3
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.2
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.7–6.9
Mobility disability among adults10.3%9.3–11.3
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.4%23.2–27.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.6–14.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.7–9.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.4–11.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Loneliness among adults32.4%29.9–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.8% (4.6–36.9%) n=396
Uninsured 18–647.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.0–32.9%) n=394
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.3% (2.0–25.9%) n=397
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.8% (6.0–53.1%) n=397
Unemployment rate (16+)4.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.3%) n=395
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–14.3%) n=394
Broadband subscription95.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.4% (57.1–97.2%) n=394
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.5% (8.5–37.5%) n=394
Homeownership rate75.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32276.3% (44.6–92.8%) n=394
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.3% (0.0–15.7%) n=394
Foreign-born population5.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.6% (0.0–20.4%) n=397
Single-parent households43.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.4% (30.6–79.7%) n=388
Population 65+10.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (8.0–46.8%) n=397
Median age34.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.9 yr (30.0–62.5) n=394
Median household income$110,616$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,137 ($39,000–$114,111) n=371
Median home value$448,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$326,300 ($73,560–$591,760) n=363
Median gross rent$2,095$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,303 ($683–$2,093) n=323
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AZ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured