Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77407

in Richmond, TexasPopulation 88,319

63.70/ 100

Ranked #2,617 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 8.2%)

Ranked #82 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 4.4%)

Ranked #20 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (top 8.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

3.7%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.5%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

10.6%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

152.8 days/year

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.1%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST21st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.2%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.1%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 77407, one of several in Richmond, Texas, overall, ranks in the top 8.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,617th) and the top 4.4% of Texas (82nd).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 1.6% nationally, coronary heart disease is in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and stroke sits in the bottom 3.5% nationally. Fatal road crashes lands in the bottom 7.4% nationally, and modeled mobility disability lies in the bottom 5.9% nationally. On the other side, modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 1.7% nationally, and disaster risk rests in the top 3.6% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure registers in the top 3.7% nationally, and modeled humid heat resides in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled colon screening settles in the bottom 6.1% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". ZIP 77494, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.2 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $98,913 predicts 80.0 years — 2.1 years above.

    Ranked #859 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.2 ± 1.7 years. The 41 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.8 years — 2.4 years above them.

    Ranked #1,200 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults16.0%13.9–18.5
High blood pressure among adults28.8%25.3–32.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Current asthma among adults8.8%7.8–10.0
Coronary heart disease among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Depression among adults16.7%14.1–19.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.4–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.8%28.9–37.0
Obesity among adults28.5%22.7–35.1
Stroke among adults2.2%2.1–2.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.2%5.8–8.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.6%10.1–13.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.9%69.6–76.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.4%70.6–78.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.7–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.1%51.0–61.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.3%57.8–64.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%70.0–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.1–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.6%8.2–11.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.6%19.9–27.8
Short sleep duration among adults39.2%32.9–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.9%13.9–18.1
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%12.8–16.3
Frequent physical distress among adults9.5%8.4–10.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.1%9.8–12.5
Any disability among adults21.3%18.2–24.7
Hearing disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Independent living disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Mobility disability among adults9.1%7.9–10.4
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6416.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)9.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)54.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle4.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription94.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate72.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population45.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households31.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+7.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age34.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$98,913$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$372,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$2,016$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.2 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 82.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured