Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

80821

in Hugo, ColoradoPopulation 1,336

47.95/ 100

Ranked #18,988 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #413 of 502 Colorado ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

82.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.45 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

32.3 mi

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10.2 per million

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST34th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.7%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

10.9 days/year

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Hugo, Colorado (ZIP 80821) stands in the bottom 41% nationally (18,988th) and the bottom 18% of Colorado (413th).

continue reading

The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: fatal road crashes stands in the top 0.9% nationally, and walkability sits in the bottom 1.0% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides in the top 1.4% nationally, and modeled tree cover stands at the national minimum. More positively, grocery sits in the top 0.5% nationally, civic resides in the top 5.1% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Fiber broadband sits in the top 5.3% nationally. Distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure stands in the bottom 6.5% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 80818, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 94.5 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 38.1 — 56 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,001 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.5%28.6–36.4
High blood pressure among adults35.6%31.1–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.7–11.9
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.4–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.5–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.1–11.4
Depression among adults24.0%20.2–28.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.9%10.0–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.5%32.0–41.3
Obesity among adults29.7%22.3–38.1
Stroke among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.3%12.4–18.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.2%8.2–12.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.7%72.2–78.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.4%69.3–77.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.0–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%59.5–70.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.8%55.0–62.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.0%60.1–77.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%12.8–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%12.7–18.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.2%18.5–28.0
Short sleep duration among adults30.6%24.5–37.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.1%17.6–24.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.2–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%13.6–18.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%14.2–19.2
Any disability among adults35.2%30.0–40.4
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.3–11.3
Mobility disability among adults16.6%13.8–19.4
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.0–5.4
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.1–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.1% (2.3–21.1%) n=507
Uninsured 18–643.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.9% (1.9–21.6%) n=503
No HS diploma (25+)11.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.0% (0.0–16.3%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50533.9% (14.8–65.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.6% (0.0–7.7%) n=505
Households without a vehicle5.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=507
Broadband subscription81.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (79.4–98.7%) n=507
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.9% (15.9–42.9%) n=507
Homeownership rate72.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.7% (51.5–93.8%) n=507
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.3%) n=507
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–14.6%) n=508
Single-parent households50.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.4% (40.1–81.1%) n=500
Population 65+18.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.6% (9.2–36.4%) n=508
Median age35.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (33.4–58.2) n=502
Median household income$66,071$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,602 ($48,743–$134,919) n=470
Median home value$264,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$458,400 ($191,360–$800,020) n=469
Median gross rent$875$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,534 ($828–$2,196) n=401
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 1.4278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.8–83.2) n=466

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.42 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured