Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

98283

in Rockport, WashingtonPopulation 442

46.35/ 100

Ranked #20,922 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #496 of 581 Washington ZIPs (bottom 14.7%)

Ranked #15 of 16 Bellingham, WA ZIPs (bottom 6.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

0.17 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

28.4 mi

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

29.6 mi

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

25.7 mi

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

7.4%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

9.6 days/year

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST45th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.4 per million

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Rockport, Washington (ZIP 98283) lands in the bottom 35% nationally (20,922nd) and the bottom 14.7% of Washington (496th).

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: walkability is in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and distance to a nursing home stands in the top 1.8% nationally. Distance to an emergency room settles in the top 2.0% nationally, and modeled disaster risk lies in the top 4.8% nationally. Better still, modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 1.6% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 2.8% nationally, and floodplain exposure registers at the national minimum. Modeled pfas sits in the bottom 4.1% nationally, humid heat rests in the bottom 6.7% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk is in the bottom 7.3% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 98237, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bellingham, WA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.9%33.8–39.8
High blood pressure among adults40.4%37.1–43.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%10.1–12.1
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.8–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.5%8.4–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.4–11.3
Depression among adults27.2%24.4–30.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.0%12.2–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%36.0–42.5
Obesity among adults35.7%31.2–40.0
Stroke among adults4.9%4.3–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.9%14.0–20.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.6–9.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.2–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.3%70.4–76.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%84.7–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.0%60.8–69.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.1%55.0–61.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.0%64.4–77.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%12.3–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.4%13.8–18.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.6%19.1–26.0
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%28.0–35.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.4%19.4–25.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.2–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults17.9%15.8–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%13.8–17.6
Any disability among adults35.6%31.7–39.4
Hearing disability among adults10.6%9.4–11.7
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.6
Mobility disability among adults18.1%15.6–20.6
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.5–5.9
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.6% (3.5–22.3%) n=583
Uninsured 18–649.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.2% (1.8–22.7%) n=582
No HS diploma (25+)9.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.5%) n=588
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50527.4% (12.3–59.7%) n=588
Unemployment rate (16+)0.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (0.0–9.7%) n=584
Households without a vehicle6.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.2%) n=580
Broadband subscription86.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.7% (81.1–97.4%) n=580
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.9% (14.6–40.6%) n=580
Homeownership rate81.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.2% (48.2–91.7%) n=580
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.6% (0.0–7.9%) n=580
Foreign-born population8.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.7% (0.3–27.6%) n=588
Single-parent households76.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (40.5–76.0%) n=574
Population 65+17.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.9% (10.3–36.9%) n=588
Median age45.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.0 yr (32.9–58.8) n=584
Median household income$72,237$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$84,646 ($56,217–$132,145) n=547
Median home value$338,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$452,750 ($241,540–$826,380) n=542
Median gross rent$755$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,416 ($840–$2,197) n=476
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.7 yr ± 1.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.2 yr (77.3–83.1) n=584

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.88 years of 79.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured