ZIP code
84338
in Trenton, UtahPopulation 526
59.03/ 100
Ranked #5,576 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)
Ranked #74 of 284 Utah ZIPs (top 26%)
Ranked #11 of 22 Logan, UT-ID ZIPs (top 50%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Binge drinking
10.9%
in the bottom 2.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST55thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
0.00%
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
5.9%
in the bottom 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance
1.6%
in the top 6.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST71stUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
19.5 per million
in the bottom 7.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST59thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
16.8%
in the top 8.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
28.8%
in the bottom 7.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST32ndUS8thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
32.5%
in the bottom 7.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST42ndUS8thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 11.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS11thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Humid extreme heat
22.9 days/year
in the bottom 20% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS20thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite health measure, Trenton, Utah (ZIP 84338) ranks in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,576th) and the top 26% of Utah (74th).
A handful of measures stand out most sharply across the profile here: modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the bottom 7.4% nationally, and high blood pressure settles in the bottom 7.7% nationally. Modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 11.5% nationally, and high cholesterol registers in the bottom 7.9% nationally. On the other side, modeled tree cover rests at the national minimum, fine-particle stands in the top 6.1% nationally, and arsenic lies in the top 8.5% nationally. Fiber broadband lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.
To spell things out, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Close by, ZIP 84320, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Logan, UT-ID metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 87%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 77%
16%
Risk Behavior
in the top 0.8%
11%
Disability
healthier than 76%
7%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 60%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 27%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 19%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 38%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 16%
5%
Lifting this score
Risk Behavior
healthier than 74%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 70%
8%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 54%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 41%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 51%
13%
Disability
healthier than 55%
7%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 40%
16%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 17%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 24%
5%
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 40%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 33%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 33%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 20%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 33%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 20%
11%
Disability
healthier than 33%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 7%
5%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
84305
Utahshares a border
Score 57.49
Closest healthier
84320
Utahshares a border
Score 62.27
Similar health profile
84003
Utah97% similar profile
Score 65.33
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 25.0% | 22.6–27.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 28.8% | 26.0–31.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.2% | 7.5–9.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.4% | 9.3–11.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.2% | 4.5–5.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.4% | 4.5–6.3 |
| Depression among adults | 26.1% | 23.1–29.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 9.4% | 8.2–10.7 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 32.5% | 29.6–35.7 |
| Obesity among adults | 29.0% | 24.7–33.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.8% | 2.5–3.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 8.9% | 7.0–11.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 9.4% | 7.6–11.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 69.1% | 66.1–72.0 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 71.1% | 67.8–74.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 80.9% | 78.5–83.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.2% | 60.7–69.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 71.8% | 68.7–74.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 74.1% | 66.5–80.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 10.9% | 9.2–12.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 8.6% | 6.9–10.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 15.9% | 13.3–18.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 30.4% | 25.9–34.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 15.4% | 13.1–18.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.0% | 14.2–18.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.7% | 11.1–14.4 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 14.9% | 13.0–17.2 |
| Any disability among adults | 28.0% | 24.6–31.8 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 6.9% | 6.2–7.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.9% | 5.9–8.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 10.9% | 9.3–12.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.0% | 2.6–3.5 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.0% | 3.5–4.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 18.6% | 15.9–21.8 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.7% | 8.7–13.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 5.7% | 4.5–7.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.4% | 7.0–10.1 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.4% | 5.5–7.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 31.8% | 28.2–36.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 6.0% | 5.1–7.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | UT median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 4.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 7.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 4.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 10.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 5.3% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 24.2% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 28.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 1.7% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281 |
| Households without a vehicle | 2.2% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283 |
| Broadband subscription | 91.9% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 5.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283 |
| Homeownership rate | 81.6% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 81.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 3.8% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283 |
| Foreign-born population | 1.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 3.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284 |
| Single-parent households | 51.1% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 49.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281 |
| Population 65+ | 13.3% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 15.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284 |
| Median age | 37.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 35.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283 |
| Median household income | $95,313 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260 |
| Median home value | $358,300 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | UT median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 84.9 yr ± 1.87 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.87 years of 84.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured