ZIP code

82930

in Evanston, UtahPopulation 14,435

ZipVitals Score

How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

54.13/ 100

Ranked #10,530 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #151 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

Jump to a section

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

25.9%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st

US1st

Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

2.2 days/year

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th

US1st

Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Park land

57.5%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th

US98th

Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

15.2 per million

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST53rd

US6th

Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th

US7th

Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th

US92nd

Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.3%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST23rd

US8th

Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th

US9th

Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.88%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th

US90th

Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.8%

in the bottom 10.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th

US11th

Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Evanston, Utah (ZIP 82930) lands in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,530th) and the bottom 47% of Utah (151st).

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 1.0% nationally, modeled humid heat settles in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and park land is in the top 1.9% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the bottom 6.2% nationally, and transportation lies in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity stands in the bottom 8.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled disaster risk registers in the top 7.6% nationally, and mammography resides in the bottom 8.3% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. On the overall standing, ZIP 84017, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare withinUnited StatesUtah

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of the United States

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

About typical

close to the middle of the United States

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Disability

healthier than 56%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of the United States

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of Utah

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of Utah

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Disability

healthier than 32%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

Below what income predicts
The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes
Estimated life expectancy is 77.1 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $81,042 predicts 79.2 years — 2.1 years below.
Ranked #2,869 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.
Below its nearby ZIPs
The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors
Estimated life expectancy is 77.1 ± 1.0 years. The 46 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.2 years — 4.0 years below them.
Ranked #3,034 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Arthritis among adults	24.9%	21.7–28.0
High blood pressure among adults	31.2%	27.2–34.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults	8.3%	7.5–9.1
Current asthma among adults	10.5%	9.1–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults	6.3%	5.7–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults	7.4%	6.5–8.2
Depression among adults	21.2%	17.8–24.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults	11.2%	9.6–12.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened	33.5%	29.3–37.5
Obesity among adults	35.2%	28.3–41.9
Stroke among adults	3.3%	3.0–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years	11.7%	9.5–14.2

PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years	12.6%	10.7–14.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure	72.6%	68.8–75.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults	67.2%	62.5–71.2
Cholesterol screening among adults	81.3%	78.9–83.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years	58.8%	53.8–63.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults	63.2%	59.5–66.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years	68.3%	60.1–75.9

Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Binge drinking among adults	15.3%	12.4–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults	15.5%	13.1–17.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults	26.7%	22.3–31.0
Short sleep duration among adults	34.1%	28.7–40.2

Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults	19.8%	17.2–22.4
Frequent mental distress among adults	16.7%	14.6–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults	14.0%	12.2–15.7

DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults	15.5%	13.6–17.4
Any disability among adults	31.3%	27.0–35.4
Hearing disability among adults	7.6%	6.7–8.5
Independent living disability among adults	8.3%	7.4–9.3
Mobility disability among adults	13.5%	11.6–15.3
Self-care disability among adults	3.8%	3.4–4.1
Vision disability among adults	4.9%	4.5–5.4

Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults	18.1%	14.6–22.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults	9.1%	6.2–13.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults	4.5%	2.8–6.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults	7.2%	5.3–9.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults	4.9%	3.7–6.3
Loneliness among adults	25.9%	21.4–30.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults	4.8%	3.7–6.0

Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate	8.3%	10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364	7.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–64	19.0%	9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286	10.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)	6.9%	7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505	5.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)	22.7%	23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505	28.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)	3.5%	3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274	2.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle	4.4%	3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322	2.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription	90.9%	89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322	93.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)	18.0%	23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322	21.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate	74.4%	78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322	81.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)	3.9%	1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322	2.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population	3.2%	2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553	3.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households	50.8%	53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087	49.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+	18.1%	19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553	15.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age	37.4 yr	42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292	35.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income	$81,042	$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318	$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value	$292,800	$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049	$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent	$847	$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670	$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198

Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth	77.1 yr ± 0.52	78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308	80.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.52 years of 77.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

Statistically similar ZIPs nationally

Similar means a ZIP whose health profile is shaped like this one’s — the same pattern of strengths and weaknesses across the nine health domains behind the Score, not similar demographics or income. The percentage is how closely the two patterns line up. A very similar ZIP can still have a different overall Score.

82604Wyoming96% similar
Score 54.28View 82604 Compare this ZIP with 82604
82609Wyoming96% similar
Score 54.20View 82609 Compare this ZIP with 82609
99654Alaska96% similar
Score 52.97View 99654 Compare this ZIP with 99654
82601Wyoming95% similar
Score 52.96View 82601 Compare this ZIP with 82601
92378California95% similar
Score 53.55View 92378 Compare this ZIP with 92378
81008Colorado95% similar
Score 53.10View 81008 Compare this ZIP with 81008
98848Washington94% similar
Score 52.48View 98848 Compare this ZIP with 98848
99504Alaska94% similar
Score 53.17View 99504 Compare this ZIP with 99504
99611Alaska92% similar
Score 50.06View 99611 Compare this ZIP with 99611
82001Wyoming92% similar
Score 55.68View 82001 Compare this ZIP with 82001

as of 2026

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured