Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84319

in Hyrum, UtahPopulation 10,931

59.71/ 100

Ranked #5,070 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #68 of 284 Utah ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #10 of 22 Logan, UT-ID ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lithium in drinking water

9.4 µg/L

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

29.6%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

25.6%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.6%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.6%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Park land

22.2%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.4%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.1%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hyrum, Utah (ZIP 84319), by its composite score, sits in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,070th) and the top 24% of Utah (68th).

continue reading

The standout strengths in the data are the natural place to begin: lithium in drinking water rests in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol resides in the bottom 3.0% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure is in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and fatal road crashes lands in the bottom 4.4% nationally. Modeled binge drinking stands in the bottom 4.9% nationally, park land registers in the top 6.3% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Modeled diabetes sits in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 8.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled fine-particle rests in the top 6.1% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 84328, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Logan, UT-ID metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.0 ± 2.4 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.3 years — 3.3 years below them.

    Ranked #2,552 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 28.8; chronic-disease standing 94.1 (top 10%) — 65 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,952 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.5%19.4–23.7
High blood pressure among adults25.6%23.0–28.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.0%6.4–7.6
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Depression among adults26.3%23.4–29.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.1%7.1–9.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened29.6%26.8–32.6
Obesity among adults28.7%24.5–33.0
Stroke among adults2.4%2.2–2.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%7.9–12.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.5%8.9–12.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure64.9%61.8–67.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.0%65.7–72.3
Cholesterol screening among adults79.5%77.0–81.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.7%57.0–66.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.3%67.2–73.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.6%65.8–80.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.6%9.9–13.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.4%6.9–9.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults15.5%13.2–18.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.3%26.8–35.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.7%12.7–16.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.8–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.4–17.1
Any disability among adults26.8%23.7–30.0
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
Independent living disability among adults6.7%5.8–7.5
Mobility disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.3–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.2%16.8–22.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.5–13.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.7–7.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.9–11.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.9–7.8
Loneliness among adults32.8%29.3–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–649.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)7.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription88.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate83.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population5.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households39.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+11.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age28.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$89,189$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$425,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$1,246$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.0 yr ± 1.2478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.24 years of 78.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured