Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83440

in Rexburg, IdahoPopulation 51,421

49.11/ 100

Ranked #17,500 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #164 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

22.2%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

25.4%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

18.8%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

5.0%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.1%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.6 pCi/L

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.8%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

12.7%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 83440, one of several in Rexburg, Idaho, by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 45% nationally (17,500th) and the bottom 39% of Idaho (164th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled cognitive disability settles in the top 0.9% nationally, disaster risk registers in the top 0.7% nationally, and expected annual loss stands in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled radon lands in the top 4.5% nationally, and crowded housing is in the top 3.1% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled high cholesterol resides in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and high blood pressure rests in the bottom 1.1% nationally. Modeled diabetes lies in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the bottom 1.6% nationally. Modeled stroke settles in the bottom 1.7% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 83434, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Not placed: Climate / Disaster Risk — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 5% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.7%

21%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Not placed: Climate / Disaster Risk — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 5% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults13.2%11.5–15.0
High blood pressure among adults18.8%16.2–21.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.7–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.0%4.4–5.7
Depression among adults27.8%24.2–31.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults5.0%4.3–5.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened22.2%19.4–25.1
Obesity among adults28.6%23.0–34.2
Stroke among adults1.8%1.6–1.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.5%13.7–19.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.3%11.1–15.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure49.2%46.4–51.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults66.9%62.4–71.1
Cholesterol screening among adults60.9%57.5–64.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.5%52.5–62.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.9%52.4–59.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.2%60.0–75.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.5–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%10.1–13.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.4%18.7–26.3
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%29.6–41.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.6%16.2–21.4
Frequent mental distress among adults23.5%20.9–26.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%10.9–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults25.4%22.7–28.2
Any disability among adults37.8%33.5–42.3
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Independent living disability among adults12.6%11.1–14.2
Mobility disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.4
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.3%18.3–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.3%20.1–26.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.1%16.3–22.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.2%13.2–17.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.3%13.5–17.3
Loneliness among adults36.0%31.3–41.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.6–12.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–646.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)2.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)7.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription77.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate38.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)12.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population5.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households52.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+4.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age21.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$58,159$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$419,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$1,000$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 0.6478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.64 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured