Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

83346

in Oakley, IdahoPopulation 1,451

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

49.97/ 100

Ranked #16,285 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #149 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

54.8%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.69 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Park land

25%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

70.8 mi

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.7%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.8%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST46th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.5 per million

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

11.9 mi

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.0%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Oakley, Idaho (ZIP 83346) ranks in the bottom 49% nationally (16,285th) and the bottom 44% of Idaho (149th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: childcare lies in the top 5.4% nationally, and park land resides in the top 5.6% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 6.4% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Against that, modeled colon screening sits in the bottom 4.8% nationally, walkability rests in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and slow internet speeds is in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled mammography stands in the bottom 7.2% nationally, distance to a nursing home settles in the top 8.1% nationally, and crowded housing lies in the top 8.5% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 83344, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.7%24.7–30.7
High blood pressure among adults34.2%30.6–37.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.8–9.4
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.4–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.6–8.9
Depression among adults22.5%19.4–25.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.6–12.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.7%30.9–38.7
Obesity among adults36.6%30.4–43.1
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.0%14.0–20.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.0%11.8–16.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.0%69.8–75.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.7%69.0–76.2
Cholesterol screening among adults80.1%77.7–82.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.8%49.3–60.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.6%63.2–70.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.8%59.1–76.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.7–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%11.6–16.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.8%22.6–31.3
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%26.2–38.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.1%18.2–24.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.7–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.3–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.3–19.7
Any disability among adults38.0%33.4–42.6
Hearing disability among adults10.7%9.5–11.9
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.1–10.6
Mobility disability among adults17.2%14.9–19.6
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.1%18.9–25.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.4%12.8–18.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.5–12.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.1–14.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.2–9.7
Loneliness among adults30.2%25.8–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.2–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6434.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)13.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)7.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle0.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription94.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate82.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population14.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households45.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+13.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age40.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$70,114$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$268,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$779$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.2 yr ± 1.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.63 years of 81.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured