Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83344

in Murtaugh, IdahoPopulation 1,234

52.86/ 100

Ranked #12,298 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #101 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

72.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

28.6%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

18.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

78.1 mi

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.3%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

1.4%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Park land

17.5%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST80th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

27.9%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

17.1%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

12.6 days/year

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Murtaugh, Idaho (ZIP 83344) ranks in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,298th) and the top 38% of Idaho (101st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: modeled high cholesterol sits in the bottom 2.3% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site is in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled pfas settles in the bottom 5.4% nationally, and park land resides in the top 7.8% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure registers in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and humid heat rests in the bottom 9.4% nationally. Set against that, fatal road crashes stands in the top 1.2% nationally, modeled uninsured lies in the top 6.2% nationally, and modeled nitrate lands in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled arsenic sits in the top 8.2% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Close by, ZIP 83341, about 2.0 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.6%20.5–24.7
High blood pressure among adults27.9%25.4–30.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.1%5.6–6.6
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.1–6.8
Depression among adults21.8%19.3–24.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened28.6%26.0–31.4
Obesity among adults34.8%30.7–39.2
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.0%11.0–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years18.3%15.3–21.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure66.6%63.6–69.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.3%66.0–72.5
Cholesterol screening among adults77.6%75.1–80.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.3%57.4–65.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.2%58.2–64.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.4%63.4–75.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.5–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.8%10.8–14.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.1%24.5–31.8
Short sleep duration among adults34.8%30.7–39.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.7%18.1–23.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.8–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.3–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.4–19.5
Any disability among adults34.2%30.7–37.8
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.4–9.1
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.5
Mobility disability among adults14.5%12.7–16.4
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%20.1–26.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.5%14.6–20.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.1–13.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.6–16.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.1–10.7
Loneliness among adults31.2%27.8–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.3–9.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6430.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)20.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle0.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription92.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate67.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population15.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households45.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+12.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age29.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$65,417$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$425,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$888$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.3 yr ± 1.3678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.36 years of 80.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured