Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83271

in Rockland, IdahoPopulation 415

49.97/ 100

Ranked #16,284 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #148 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

63.9%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST14th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

8.3 days/year

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Park land

18%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST80th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.10%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.2%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST47th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.9%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

11.3 mi

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.8%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Rockland, Idaho (ZIP 83271) ranks in the bottom 49% nationally (16,284th) and the bottom 45% of Idaho (148th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled air-toxics cancer risk sits in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and humid heat rests in the bottom 5.5% nationally. Unemployment is at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Park land stands in the top 7.6% nationally, modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 8.4% nationally, and modeled pfas lies in the bottom 8.8% nationally. Against that, modeled mammography resides in the bottom 2.1% nationally, walkability lands in the bottom 4.9% nationally, and modeled nitrate registers in the top 8.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits in the top 8.9% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 83243, less than a tenth of a mile away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%26.8–34.1
High blood pressure among adults35.4%31.2–39.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.8–10.8
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.3–9.8
Depression among adults23.1%19.6–26.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.4–12.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%31.9–40.5
Obesity among adults35.5%28.2–43.5
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.5%11.7–17.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%7.0–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.1%70.7–77.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.5%71.7–79.1
Cholesterol screening among adults82.3%79.9–84.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.8%52.0–63.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.7%56.7–64.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years63.9%54.0–72.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.2–16.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.3%11.6–17.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.2%19.9–29.0
Short sleep duration among adults32.3%25.9–38.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.3%16.3–22.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.6–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%13.1–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.0–18.5
Any disability among adults36.0%31.3–40.9
Hearing disability among adults11.0%9.8–12.4
Independent living disability among adults9.0%7.8–10.4
Mobility disability among adults16.6%14.2–19.2
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.5–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.5–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.1%15.9–22.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%9.8–14.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.4–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.7–11.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.4
Loneliness among adults28.2%23.6–33.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.6–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6419.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)2.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle0.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription96.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate84.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households60.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+18.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age41.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$62,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$279,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$945$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 2.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.63 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured