ZIP code
83233
in Dingle, IdahoPopulation 147
51.44/ 100
Ranked #14,207 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)
Ranked #125 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (top 47%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Mammography
59.6%
in the bottom 0.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
80.2%
in the top 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
27.5 mi
in the top 2.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST84thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
26.8%
in the bottom 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST24thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
10 per million
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
54.5%
in the bottom 4.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Humid extreme heat
5.8 days/year
in the bottom 3.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST14thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite measure, Dingle, Idaho (ZIP 83233) sits in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,207th) and the top 47% of Idaho (125th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: poverty resides at the national minimum, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 2.5% nationally, and modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Homeownership stands at the national maximum, home broadband subscription is at the national maximum, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled humid heat sits in the bottom 3.7% nationally. On the other hand, modeled mammography registers in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled colon screening resides in the bottom 4.5% nationally.
In plain language, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 83254, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 66%
16%
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.8%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 64%
11%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
in the top 0.00%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 55%
21%
Mental Health
healthier than 57%
8%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 9%
13%
Disability
healthier than 31%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 27%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.00%
14%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
in the top 0.00%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 55%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 47%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 45%
8%
Disability
healthier than 46%
7%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 12%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 17%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 21%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
83254
Idahoshares a border
Score 51.88
Closest healthier
83272
Idahoshares a border
Score 54.54
Similar health profile
88346
New Mexico95% similar profile
Score 50.04
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 29.9% | 26.3–33.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 35.0% | 30.7–39.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.8% | 7.8–9.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.9% | 9.6–12.4 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.3% | 6.2–8.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.5% | 6.9–10.6 |
| Depression among adults | 22.6% | 19.2–26.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 11.7% | 9.9–13.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 35.2% | 31.0–39.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 34.5% | 27.6–41.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.9% | 3.3–4.5 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 15.4% | 12.5–18.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.7% | 6.1–12.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 71.6% | 67.3–75.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 74.0% | 69.9–77.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 83.2% | 79.6–86.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 54.5% | 48.5–59.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 69.6% | 66.0–72.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 59.6% | 49.1–68.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.2% | 11.7–17.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.5% | 13.0–21.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 25.6% | 20.1–30.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 33.3% | 26.4–39.8 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 20.1% | 16.0–24.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.4% | 14.0–18.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.0% | 13.5–18.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.4% | 13.3–19.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 35.6% | 30.0–40.8 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.3% | 9.0–11.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.1% | 7.4–11.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 17.1% | 14.0–20.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.6% | 3.7–5.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.3% | 4.3–6.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.9% | 16.0–23.8 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.7% | 9.9–18.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 10.6% | 7.4–14.3 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.9% | 8.2–13.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.4% | 5.8–9.2 |
| Loneliness among adults | 26.8% | 22.1–31.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.9% | 6.2–9.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ID median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 12.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 22.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 1.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 90.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 80.2% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 22.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 2.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277 |
| Single-parent households | 19.8% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 58.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277 |
| Median age | 46.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $990 ($730–$1,495) n=192 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ID median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.6 yr ± 1.42 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.42 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured