Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

83221

in Blackfoot, IdahoPopulation 29,081

47.92/ 100

Ranked #19,013 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #182 of 268 Idaho ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

66.1%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST27th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

1.8%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.3%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST43rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.9 per million

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST25th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32.7%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

41.9%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US80th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

5.5 mi

in the bottom 24% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US24th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Blackfoot, Idaho (ZIP 83221) places in the bottom 41% nationally (19,013th) and the bottom 32% of Idaho (182nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: distance to an emergency room is at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the bottom 7.8% nationally, and humid heat stands in the bottom 10.3% nationally. Distance to a community health center registers at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled mammography settles in the bottom 4.1% nationally, disaster risk sits in the top 3.4% nationally, and nitrate lies in the top 5.8% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 6.6% nationally, modeled fine-particle resides in the top 7.6% nationally, and walkability is in the bottom 8.8% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 83202, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 88%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.5 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $75,172 predicts 79.0 years — 1.5 years below.

    Ranked #1,807 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.5 ± 1.2 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.3 years — 2.8 years below them.

    Ranked #2,183 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.1%25.1–30.9
High blood pressure among adults34.0%30.4–37.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.2–8.7
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Depression among adults23.3%20.0–26.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.9%10.4–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.7%29.1–36.1
Obesity among adults39.8%33.8–45.2
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.0%13.2–19.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.0%11.3–14.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.3%68.1–74.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.9%70.2–77.0
Cholesterol screening among adults79.1%76.9–81.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.4%53.4–63.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.2%59.7–66.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.1%57.6–74.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.1–15.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%13.1–16.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.7%22.0–29.2
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%28.9–39.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.2%18.8–23.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.4–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.7–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.1%16.3–19.9
Any disability among adults39.8%35.7–43.4
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.3–11.3
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.6–10.6
Mobility disability among adults17.0%15.1–18.9
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.3–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.4%15.2–19.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.9–14.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.5%11.7–15.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Loneliness among adults30.7%26.5–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.7–10.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.9% (1.2–20.3%) n=275
Uninsured 18–6411.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28612.8% (0.0–25.9%) n=276
No HS diploma (25+)9.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.9% (0.0–17.9%) n=275
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (8.6–44.8%) n=275
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.8%) n=274
Households without a vehicle5.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=275
Broadband subscription90.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.8% (79.9–100.0%) n=275
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (1.7–33.4%) n=275
Homeownership rate79.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.7% (61.8–97.5%) n=275
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.8% (0.0–7.2%) n=275
Foreign-born population4.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.6% (0.0–13.3%) n=277
Single-parent households46.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08758.4% (44.1–86.8%) n=271
Population 65+15.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.3–42.1%) n=277
Median age34.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (31.8–62.3) n=273
Median household income$75,172$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,814 ($51,606–$96,415) n=252
Median home value$281,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$344,400 ($224,720–$577,280) n=247
Median gross rent$883$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$990 ($730–$1,495) n=192
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ID median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.5 yr ± 0.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.9 yr (76.8–83.5) n=278

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.62 years of 77.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured