Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

82601

in Casper, WyomingPopulation 26,721

52.96/ 100

Ranked #12,141 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #59 of 155 Wyoming ZIPs (top 38%)

Too few scored ZIPs in the Casper, WY metro area to rank within it.

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

128.4 mi

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

5.8 days/year

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.66 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

18.5 per million

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.9%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST62nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.24%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.7%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 82601, one of several in Casper, Wyoming ranks in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,141st) and the top 38% of Wyoming (59th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 2.4% nationally, and modeled humid heat is in the bottom 3.7% nationally. Distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Childcare resides in the top 5.8% nationally, physicians registers in the top 6.3% nationally, and dental providers rests in the top 6.3% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the bottom 6.9% nationally, and floodplain exposure lies in the bottom 8.4% nationally. On the other side, modeled disaster risk lands in the top 2.7% nationally, and mammography sits in the bottom 7.4% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Close by, ZIP 82604, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Casper, WY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.9%21.6–26.3
High blood pressure among adults29.5%26.6–32.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.3–8.7
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.4–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.5–8.2
Depression among adults23.8%20.9–26.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.7–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.7%28.6–34.7
Obesity among adults36.9%32.2–41.5
Stroke among adults3.2%3.0–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.7%11.2–16.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.2%10.5–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.3%68.9–75.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.7%66.1–73.1
Cholesterol screening among adults80.8%78.5–82.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.1%55.6–64.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.2%58.7–65.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.9%60.7–74.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.8–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.7–17.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.0%23.6–30.2
Short sleep duration among adults34.3%29.8–38.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.2%17.0–21.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.2–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.6–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.5%13.7–17.2
Any disability among adults32.8%29.5–36.1
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Mobility disability among adults13.8%12.2–15.3
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.5–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.7% (0.0–30.1%) n=166
Uninsured 18–6418.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.2% (0.0–38.1%) n=162
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (0.0–14.4%) n=166
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.0% (0.0–52.6%) n=166
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2740.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=165
Households without a vehicle5.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=166
Broadband subscription91.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (69.3–100.0%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (0.0–51.0%) n=166
Homeownership rate69.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.7% (49.5–100.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.3%) n=166
Foreign-born population2.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.4% (0.0–8.0%) n=167
Single-parent households48.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.7% (36.3–100.0%) n=157
Population 65+16.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.8% (5.7–52.0%) n=167
Median age38.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.8 yr (30.6–64.2) n=157
Median household income$67,642$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,404 ($52,987–$128,423) n=124
Median home value$249,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$278,800 ($120,840–$590,020) n=125
Median gross rent$835$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$904 ($642–$1,322) n=84
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (78.2–83.4) n=168

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured