Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

82240

in Torrington, WyomingPopulation 9,667

48.10/ 100

Ranked #18,809 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #110 of 155 Wyoming ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

16.5%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.1%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST51st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

9.6 ppb

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

US96th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.21 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.9 per million

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

20.3 mi

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

58.4 mi

in the top 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST34th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 11.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

51 µg/L

in the top 14.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

28 days/year

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Torrington, Wyoming (ZIP 82240) comes out in the bottom 41% nationally (18,809th) and the bottom 29% of Wyoming (110th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: elder services sits in the top 6.9% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the bottom 7.9% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site registers in the top 9.1% nationally. Mental-health providers stands in the top 10.5% nationally. Set against that, modeled nitrate lands in the top 2.5% nationally, and mammography is in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Lead in tap water resides in the top 3.7% nationally, and distance to a community health center rests in the top 8.1% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies in the top 10.3% nationally, and modeled tree cover sits in the bottom 10.9% nationally.

In plain terms, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 82212, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.7 ± 3.4 years. A median household income of $60,766 predicts 78.1 years — 5.6 years above.

    Ranked #24 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.1%26.9–33.5
High blood pressure among adults36.7%32.7–40.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.2–11.3
Current asthma among adults10.2%8.9–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.5–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.6–9.8
Depression among adults21.2%17.9–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.3–14.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%31.8–40.2
Obesity among adults37.9%30.6–45.5
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.3%9.7–15.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.7%10.7–14.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.5%72.2–78.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.1%67.8–75.9
Cholesterol screening among adults82.8%80.7–85.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.3%54.0–66.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.7%57.1–66.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.1%55.6–75.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%11.6–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.9%12.7–17.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.4%24.1–33.1
Short sleep duration among adults31.6%25.0–38.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.9%18.2–23.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.5–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.3–16.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.2–16.8
Any disability among adults33.6%29.5–38.0
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Independent living disability among adults9.0%7.9–10.1
Mobility disability among adults16.1%14.0–18.4
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.7% (0.0–30.1%) n=166
Uninsured 18–6416.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.2% (0.0–38.1%) n=162
No HS diploma (25+)5.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (0.0–14.4%) n=166
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.0% (0.0–52.6%) n=166
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2740.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=165
Households without a vehicle7.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=166
Broadband subscription80.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (69.3–100.0%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (0.0–51.0%) n=166
Homeownership rate71.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.7% (49.5–100.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.3%) n=166
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.4% (0.0–8.0%) n=167
Single-parent households53.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.7% (36.3–100.0%) n=157
Population 65+23.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.8% (5.7–52.0%) n=167
Median age42.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.8 yr (30.6–64.2) n=157
Median household income$60,766$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,404 ($52,987–$128,423) n=124
Median home value$244,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$278,800 ($120,840–$590,020) n=125
Median gross rent$785$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$904 ($642–$1,322) n=84
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.7 yr ± 1.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (78.2–83.4) n=168

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.73 years of 83.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured