Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

82212

in Fort Laramie, WyomingPopulation 509

50.70/ 100

Ranked #15,274 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #88 of 155 Wyoming ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

2.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

6.6%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

42 mi

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.7 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST35th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.7%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

12 per million

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.6%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.9%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

8.9%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

60.5 mi

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST35th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Fort Laramie, Wyoming (ZIP 82212) ranks in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,274th) and the bottom 43% of Wyoming (88th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: childcare settles in the top 0.2% nationally, and modeled short sleep lies in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and binge drinking lands in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Households without a vehicle registers at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 8.2% nationally. On the other hand, modeled energy burden rests in the top 1.6% nationally, distance to a community health center is in the top 1.9% nationally, and walkability stands in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Slow internet speeds settles in the top 6.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, childcare runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 82219, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.7%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.0%32.0–40.0
High blood pressure among adults42.2%37.7–46.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.9%12.6–15.3
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.8%8.5–11.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.4–10.4
Depression among adults19.2%16.1–22.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.2–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.6%36.7–46.3
Obesity among adults35.6%28.3–43.0
Stroke among adults4.6%4.0–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.9%9.4–15.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%6.3–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%76.8–83.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%74.4–81.5
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%88.7–91.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.4%60.2–72.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.4%63.1–71.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.5%60.2–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.6%9.3–14.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.3%9.9–14.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%21.0–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults28.7%22.5–35.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.7%15.7–21.9
Frequent mental distress among adults12.2%10.6–13.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%12.7–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.5%9.8–13.3
Any disability among adults32.0%27.5–36.6
Hearing disability among adults11.0%9.6–12.5
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.3–8.6
Mobility disability among adults16.5%13.8–19.2
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.3–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.6%3.9–5.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.7% (0.0–30.1%) n=166
Uninsured 18–6430.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.2% (0.0–38.1%) n=162
No HS diploma (25+)6.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (0.0–14.4%) n=166
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.0% (0.0–52.6%) n=166
Unemployment rate (16+)0.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2740.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=165
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=166
Broadband subscription76.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (69.3–100.0%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (0.0–51.0%) n=166
Homeownership rate82.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.7% (49.5–100.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.3%) n=166
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.4% (0.0–8.0%) n=167
Single-parent households69.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.7% (36.3–100.0%) n=157
Population 65+33.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.8% (5.7–52.0%) n=167
Median age55.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.8 yr (30.6–64.2) n=157
Median household income$48,529$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,404 ($52,987–$128,423) n=124
Median home value$178,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$278,800 ($120,840–$590,020) n=125
Median gross rent$1,023$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$904 ($642–$1,322) n=84
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 0.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (78.2–83.4) n=168

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.84 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured