Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

82050

in Albin, WyomingPopulation 302

57.70/ 100

Ranked #6,646 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #19 of 155 Wyoming ZIPs (top 12.3%)

Ranked #6 of 11 Cheyenne, WY ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

1 days/year

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

29.2%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

24.6 mi

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

10 ppb

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

US98th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.98 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

23.8 mi

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.6 µg/L

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

27.6 mi

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST53rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.8%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Albin, Wyoming (ZIP 82050) places in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,646th) and the top 12.3% of Wyoming (19th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled humid heat is in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and lithium in drinking water lands in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Modeled transportation noise stands in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and pfas registers in the bottom 6.5% nationally. On the other side, unemployment settles in the top 0.9% nationally, distance to a nursing home sits in the top 2.3% nationally, and lead in tap water lies in the top 2.3% nationally. Walkability rests in the bottom 2.6% nationally, distance to an emergency room resides in the top 3.5% nationally, and distance to a community health center is in the top 4.8% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, unemployment runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 82009, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cheyenne, WY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 1.0%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.3%21.9–26.7
High blood pressure among adults30.5%27.7–33.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.1
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.2–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.4–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%4.8–6.6
Depression among adults18.9%16.3–21.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.2–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.3%32.2–38.3
Obesity among adults32.5%28.2–36.9
Stroke among adults3.0%2.6–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.3%10.2–14.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.6%10.6–15.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.8%70.5–76.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.1%67.8–74.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%82.9–86.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.2%64.3–72.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.9%67.1–72.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.7%67.6–79.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%12.2–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.8%8.8–13.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.1%21.6–28.7
Short sleep duration among adults31.7%28.1–35.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.4%14.1–18.7
Frequent mental distress among adults13.9%12.1–15.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%10.9–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.7%10.1–13.4
Any disability among adults27.4%24.2–30.8
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.2–7.0
Mobility disability among adults12.0%10.3–13.8
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.7% (0.0–30.1%) n=166
Uninsured 18–6434.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.2% (0.0–38.1%) n=162
No HS diploma (25+)3.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (0.0–14.4%) n=166
Bachelor's or higher (25+)7.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.0% (0.0–52.6%) n=166
Unemployment rate (16+)29.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2740.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=165
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=166
Broadband subscription92.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (69.3–100.0%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (0.0–51.0%) n=166
Homeownership rate56.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.7% (49.5–100.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.3%) n=166
Foreign-born population5.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.4% (0.0–8.0%) n=167
Single-parent households87.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.7% (36.3–100.0%) n=157
Population 65+13.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.8% (5.7–52.0%) n=167
Median age50.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.8 yr (30.6–64.2) n=157
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,404 ($52,987–$128,423) n=124
Median home value$163,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$278,800 ($120,840–$590,020) n=125
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$904 ($642–$1,322) n=84
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 1.4078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (78.2–83.4) n=168

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.40 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured