Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

82009

in Cheyenne, WyomingPopulation 35,081

60.04/ 100

Ranked #4,839 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranked #12 of 155 Wyoming ZIPs (top 7.8%)

Ranked #2 of 11 Cheyenne, WY ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

15 ppb

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

3.2 days/year

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST45th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.6 µg/L

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.9 mi

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST47th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.81 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

8.1%

in the bottom 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 82009, one of several in Cheyenne, Wyoming lands in the top 15% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,839th) and the top 7.8% of Wyoming (12th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled humid heat rests in the bottom 2.0% nationally, lithium in drinking water registers in the bottom 4.1% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 8.2% nationally. Dental providers settles in the top 10.6% nationally, and modeled short sleep is in the bottom 13.0% nationally. On the other side, lead in tap water sits in the top 1.0% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss lands in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lies in the top 2.6% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site stands in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Walkability rests in the bottom 8.7% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. On the overall standing, ZIP 82005, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cheyenne, WY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.7 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $103,835 predicts 80.2 years — 1.5 years above.

    Ranked #1,256 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%24.3–29.4
High blood pressure among adults31.8%28.9–34.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.4–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.5–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.1
Depression among adults20.2%17.6–22.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.2–12.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%33.2–39.6
Obesity among adults32.2%27.9–36.5
Stroke among adults3.1%2.9–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.1%6.7–9.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.8–10.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.5%72.3–78.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.2%69.9–76.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.4–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.9%63.1–70.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.6%68.9–74.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.2%67.2–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.4–15.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.8–13.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.8%21.7–28.0
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%27.1–34.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.1%14.2–18.1
Frequent mental distress among adults14.2%12.6–15.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.3–14.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.7%10.4–13.1
Any disability among adults27.6%24.6–30.6
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Independent living disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Mobility disability among adults12.7%11.2–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.7% (0.0–30.1%) n=166
Uninsured 18–648.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.2% (0.0–38.1%) n=162
No HS diploma (25+)3.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (0.0–14.4%) n=166
Bachelor's or higher (25+)41.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.0% (0.0–52.6%) n=166
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2740.9% (0.0–9.4%) n=165
Households without a vehicle4.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=166
Broadband subscription93.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (69.3–100.0%) n=166
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (0.0–51.0%) n=166
Homeownership rate81.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.7% (49.5–100.0%) n=166
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–6.3%) n=166
Foreign-born population3.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.4% (0.0–8.0%) n=167
Single-parent households61.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.7% (36.3–100.0%) n=157
Population 65+22.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.8% (5.7–52.0%) n=167
Median age45.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.8 yr (30.6–64.2) n=157
Median household income$103,835$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,404 ($52,987–$128,423) n=124
Median home value$450,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$278,800 ($120,840–$590,020) n=125
Median gross rent$1,166$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$904 ($642–$1,322) n=84
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 0.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (78.2–83.4) n=168

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.73 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured