Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78384

in San Diego, TexasPopulation 5,747

29.42/ 100

Ranked #30,877 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.8%)

Ranked #1,830 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 2.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

37.3%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

13.7%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

39.5%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.7%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

50.3%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

63.3%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

45.7%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

21.1%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

22.7%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

25.2%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, San Diego, Texas (ZIP 78384) ranks in the bottom 3.8% nationally (30,877th) and the bottom 2.1% of Texas (1,830th).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled uninsured resides in the top 0.4% nationally, and vision disability registers in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the top 0.8% nationally, and self-care disability stands in the top 1.7% nationally. Modeled colon screening lies in the bottom 2.2% nationally, mammography lands in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and arsenic sits in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled diabetes is in the top 2.4% nationally, cognitive disability settles in the top 2.8% nationally, and mobility disability resides in the top 3.3% nationally.

To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Close by, ZIP 78332, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.1%23.3–28.9
High blood pressure among adults41.2%37.3–45.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.3–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
Depression among adults21.6%18.8–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.1%18.9–23.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.4%35.5–43.4
Obesity among adults44.9%37.0–52.9
Stroke among adults5.2%4.7–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.0%16.0–22.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years37.3%33.1–41.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.1%72.5–77.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.8%67.9–75.4
Cholesterol screening among adults79.9%77.5–82.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years50.3%45.4–55.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults38.1%34.9–41.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years63.3%54.9–71.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.3–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.9%17.5–22.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults45.1%40.0–50.3
Short sleep duration among adults43.3%36.6–50.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults39.5%35.9–43.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.8%17.8–21.9
Frequent physical distress among adults20.8%18.7–23.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.7%20.5–25.0
Any disability among adults46.5%42.0–50.9
Hearing disability among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Independent living disability among adults14.1%12.7–15.6
Mobility disability among adults25.2%22.7–27.8
Self-care disability among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Vision disability among adults13.7%12.5–15.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate39.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6434.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)21.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)7.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)14.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle12.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription66.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate67.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population4.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households30.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+14.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age33.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$47,603$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$78,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$764$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.1 yr ± 1.3578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.35 years of 77.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured