Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

77316

in Montgomery, TexasPopulation 34,694

57.75/ 100

Ranked #6,605 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #199 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 10.7%)

Ranked #48 of 237 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

40.8 per million

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

156.8 days/year

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

54.6 days/year

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$124,055

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST45th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

18.9%

in the top 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.4%

in the bottom 13.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

15.4%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 77316, one of several in Montgomery, Texas places in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,605th) and the top 10.7% of Texas (199th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: fiber broadband settles in the top 8.1% nationally, and household income sits in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled radon lies in the bottom 8.2% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the top 2.0% nationally, humid heat resides in the top 3.0% nationally, and expected annual loss is in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lands in the top 8.1% nationally, industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 11.0% nationally, and binge drinking registers in the top 11.9% nationally. Modeled disaster risk settles in the top 14.4% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 77384, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.1 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $124,055 predicts 80.9 years — 2.9 years below.

    Ranked #3,942 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.8 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 78.1 ± 1.4 years.

    Ranked #397 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.8%21.8–27.8
High blood pressure among adults32.1%28.3–35.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.5–9.1
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.7–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.5%4.8–6.1
Depression among adults22.4%19.1–25.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.1–11.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%33.5–41.8
Obesity among adults30.5%24.3–37.0
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.4%7.7–11.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.0%8.5–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.3%72.9–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.4–78.6
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%87.1–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.9%61.7–69.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.2%60.1–66.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%71.4–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.9%15.7–22.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.1%9.5–12.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.9%16.7–23.5
Short sleep duration among adults36.2%32.1–40.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.4%13.5–17.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%14.0–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults11.6%10.2–13.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.0%10.7–13.4
Any disability among adults25.1%21.7–28.6
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Mobility disability among adults11.1%9.7–12.7
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6414.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)5.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription95.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate89.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population5.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households53.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+17.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age41.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$124,055$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$431,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,304$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 0.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.73 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured