Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

78372

in Orange Grove, TexasPopulation 5,383

45.48/ 100

Ranked #21,899 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #913 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

55.3%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

22.6%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

92.1 days/year

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

165 days/year

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

26.4 mi

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

72%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Orange Grove, Texas (ZIP 78372), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 32% nationally (21,899th) and the top 49% of Texas (913th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: modeled arsenic resides in the top 0.5% nationally, uninsured rests in the top 3.1% nationally, and extreme heat lies in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled humid heat sits in the top 2.4% nationally, distance to an emergency room settles in the top 2.7% nationally, and home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 11.1% nationally, and colon screening lands in the bottom 11.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home is in the top 14.3% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled radon resides in the bottom 5.2% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, arsenic runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 78330, about 0.3 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the bottom 0.01%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the bottom 0.2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.4%21.5–27.4
High blood pressure among adults35.1%31.1–39.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.2
Depression among adults21.3%18.3–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.3%12.5–16.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.8%33.6–42.1
Obesity among adults36.7%29.1–45.1
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.3%10.0–14.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years22.6%19.8–25.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.4%73.4–79.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.0%70.1–77.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.8–87.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.9%53.6–64.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.6%50.8–58.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.5%65.5–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.6–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.4%11.5–15.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.7%27.0–36.6
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%30.9–45.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.9%22.0–27.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%14.9–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.2–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.8%14.1–17.7
Any disability among adults34.6%30.4–38.9
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.3
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.7–9.6
Mobility disability among adults16.3%14.3–18.3
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.0–4.9
Vision disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6429.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)20.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)7.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription72.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate78.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population6.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households38.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+17.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age37.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$52,237$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$161,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$904$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 0.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.90 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured