ZIP code
76598
in Gatesville, TexasPopulation 491
22.24/ 100
Ranked #31,730 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.1%)
Ranked #1,865 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 0.2%)
Ranked #29 of 31 Killeen-Temple, TX ZIPs (bottom 6.5%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Independent-living disability
21.4%
in the top 0.08% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
37.1%
in the bottom 0.08% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
31.6%
in the top 0.09% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Uninsured (under 65)
28.3%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
13.0%
in the top 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Mammography
60.8%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
38.9%
in the top 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
49.1%
in the top 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
8.4%
in the top 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Obesity
51.1%
in the top 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›The read
In its overall standing, ZIP 76598, one of several in Gatesville, Texas lands in the bottom 1.1% nationally (31,730th) and the bottom 0.2% of Texas (1,865th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: modeled independent living disability lies in the top 0.08% nationally, colon screening stands in the bottom 0.08% nationally, and cognitive disability rests in the top 0.09% nationally. Modeled uninsured registers in the top 1.5% nationally, vision disability resides in the top 1.3% nationally, and mammography settles in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health is in the top 0.9% nationally, and short sleep sits in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled self-care disability lands in the top 2.1% nationally, and obesity lies in the top 0.5% nationally.
Against the wider neighborhood, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. On the overall standing, ZIP 76528, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Killeen-Temple, TX metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 73%
14%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 50%
21%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 2%
16%
Preventive Care
in the bottom 0.2%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the bottom 0.07%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Disability
healthier than 3%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 17%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 9%
5%
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 88%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 56%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 36%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
in the bottom 0.3%
16%
Preventive Care
in the bottom 0.4%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the bottom 0.06%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Disability
healthier than 3%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 9%
5%
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the top 0.00%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 41%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 32%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 7%
16%
Preventive Care
in the bottom 0.5%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 4%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Disability
healthier than 2%
7%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
76528
Texasshares a border
Score 44.41
Closest healthier
76599
Texasshares a border
Score 22.39
Similar health profile
96128
California99% similar profile
Score 34.80
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 23.9% | 21.1–27.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 31.1% | 27.4–35.1 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 3.3% | 2.9–3.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 15.9% | 14.0–18.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 3.9% | 3.2–4.5 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.7% | 8.6–13.1 |
| Depression among adults | 37.2% | 32.6–42.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 12.7% | 10.8–14.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 27.9% | 24.4–31.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 51.1% | 43.4–58.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.4% | 2.8–3.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 27.5% | 22.5–33.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 28.3% | 22.6–34.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 66.1% | 62.1–69.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 72.7% | 68.4–76.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 74.6% | 70.6–78.8 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 37.1% | 31.8–42.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 33.2% | 29.8–36.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 60.8% | 51.0–70.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.8% | 10.4–15.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 28.2% | 22.8–33.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 47.5% | 40.9–54.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 49.1% | 42.4–56.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 38.9% | 32.7–45.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 32.5% | 28.8–36.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 21.1% | 18.0–24.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 31.6% | 26.9–36.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 46.9% | 40.5–53.0 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.6% | 3.9–5.3 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 21.4% | 17.9–25.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 21.5% | 17.8–25.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 8.4% | 6.8–10.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 13.0% | 10.9–15.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | TX median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | — | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 22.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 11.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 12.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | — | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 89.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 26.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 75.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 3.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868 |
| Foreign-born population | 1.6% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 8.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861 |
| Population 65+ | 3.3% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 16.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886 |
| Median age | 41.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 38.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | TX median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 73.8 yr ± 1.20 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.20 years of 73.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured