Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

75901

in Lufkin, TexasPopulation 28,234

37.09/ 100

Ranked #28,479 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.2%)

Ranked #1,645 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 12.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

21.2%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

30.9%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

143.3 days/year

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

56.8 days/year

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

35.1 per million

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

21.9%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST47th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

40.7%

in the top 29% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US71st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 75901, one of several in Lufkin, Texas, on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 11.2% nationally (28,479th) and the bottom 12.0% of Texas (1,645th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled uninsured stands in the top 3.8% nationally. Working the other way, modeled fair or poor health is in the top 6.8% nationally, humid heat rests in the top 6.4% nationally, and extreme heat sits in the top 7.8% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the top 9.1% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the top 10.0% nationally. Modeled short sleep resides in the top 10.5% nationally, and crowded housing lies in the top 11.1% nationally. Modeled vision disability settles in the top 10.6% nationally, and colon screening stands in the bottom 10.5% nationally.

In everyday language, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 75904, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.7 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $62,966 predicts 78.3 years — 2.5 years below.

    Ranked #3,502 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.8%26.4–31.3
High blood pressure among adults42.4%39.3–45.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.3%6.7–8.0
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.5–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Depression among adults24.2%21.4–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.1%14.4–17.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%38.2–44.4
Obesity among adults41.9%37.4–46.3
Stroke among adults4.5%4.2–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.5%16.6–22.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years21.2%18.8–23.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.9–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%72.1–78.1
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%82.0–85.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.6%54.4–62.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.2%44.1–50.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%66.6–78.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.8–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.1%16.1–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.5%32.0–39.0
Short sleep duration among adults41.6%37.5–45.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.9%28.3–33.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%18.0–21.8
Frequent physical distress among adults18.0%16.2–19.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.6%16.8–20.4
Any disability among adults41.9%38.5–45.3
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.7–9.5
Independent living disability among adults11.7%10.6–12.9
Mobility disability among adults21.9%19.9–24.0
Self-care disability among adults6.0%5.5–6.5
Vision disability among adults8.3%7.7–9.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6426.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)16.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription91.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate63.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population12.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households44.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+14.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age34.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$62,966$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$177,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,128$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.7 yr ± 0.5278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.52 years of 75.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured