Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

73051

in Lexington, OklahomaPopulation 10,274

38.97/ 100

Ranked #27,410 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.6%)

Ranked #356 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #90 of 105 Oklahoma City, OK ZIPs (bottom 14.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

98.2%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.3%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST54th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

59.7 days/year

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.03%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.6%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST19th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Lexington, Oklahoma (ZIP 73051) lands in the bottom 14.6% nationally (27,410th) and the bottom 44% of Oklahoma (356th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: fiber broadband stands in the top 6.3% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lies at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Set against that, crowded housing lands in the top 6.3% nationally, modeled mammography sits in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and modeled extreme heat is in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled nitrate settles in the top 8.5% nationally, colon screening resides in the bottom 8.4% nationally, and hearing disability registers in the top 10.1% nationally. Modeled obesity rests in the top 10.2% nationally, and utility shutoff stands in the top 13.5% nationally.

A note on the terms: nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 73068, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Oklahoma City, OK metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.3%26.4–32.0
High blood pressure among adults42.5%38.9–45.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.2–8.7
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.7–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.7–11.1
Depression among adults25.1%21.9–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.2%13.3–17.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.2%37.6–44.7
Obesity among adults42.7%37.5–47.6
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.8%15.6–22.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.8%10.9–15.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.3%73.4–78.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.9%73.6–79.8
Cholesterol screening among adults83.0%80.8–84.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.6%52.6–62.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.1%47.4–54.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.0%60.2–75.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.3%11.1–15.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.7%18.1–23.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.9%29.8–38.2
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%33.4–43.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.3%22.3–28.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.6–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.3–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.9%16.8–21.2
Any disability among adults42.8%38.8–46.9
Hearing disability among adults10.9%9.7–12.1
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.5–11.9
Mobility disability among adults19.3%17.0–21.6
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Vision disability among adults7.0%6.4–7.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.7%23.1–30.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.8%18.9–25.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.1%15.5–20.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.7%13.5–17.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
Loneliness among adults33.0%28.8–37.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.6–13.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6422.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)15.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)5.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription87.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate80.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population4.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households54.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+15.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age41.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$65,872$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$164,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$990$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 1.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.82 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured