Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

75946

in Garrison, TexasPopulation 4,170

44.06/ 100

Ranked #23,360 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #1,086 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

139.4 days/year

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

11.0%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.5%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

36.8 per million

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

50.4 days/year

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

12.0%

in the top 10.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST45th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

42.1%

in the top 28% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Garrison, Texas (ZIP 75946) comes out in the bottom 27% nationally (23,360th) and the bottom 42% of Texas (1,086th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled pfas settles in the bottom 7.9% nationally, and radon registers in the bottom 8.0% nationally. By contrast, modeled humid heat stands in the top 7.5% nationally, unemployment lands in the top 7.9% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat resides in the top 9.3% nationally. Fiber broadband rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle lies in the top 10.9% nationally, and fatal road crashes sits in the top 12.3% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles in the top 13.4% nationally.

In plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 75965, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.5%27.7–33.5
High blood pressure among adults41.7%38.1–45.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.5–10.1
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.7–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.4–10.4
Depression among adults23.2%20.3–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.7–17.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%36.2–43.7
Obesity among adults34.6%28.5–41.2
Stroke among adults4.8%4.4–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.6%14.2–19.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.2%11.5–14.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%78.2–82.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.0%74.0–79.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%85.2–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.2%57.6–66.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.4%49.2–55.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.5%64.3–78.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.8–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%14.0–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.1%26.1–34.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%32.6–44.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.4%22.0–27.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%16.2–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%14.2–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.0%14.5–17.8
Any disability among adults36.6%32.9–40.4
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.1–9.8
Independent living disability among adults10.3%9.3–11.4
Mobility disability among adults19.1%17.2–21.1
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.8–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.6%6.1–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6427.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)14.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)11.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle12.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription82.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate68.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population3.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households55.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+21.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age43.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$58,177$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$151,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$908$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.5 yr ± 1.0878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.08 years of 76.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured