Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

75755

in Big Sandy, TexasPopulation 5,244

39.90/ 100

Ranked #26,829 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #1,463 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #26 of 29 Longview, TX ZIPs (bottom 10.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.19 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

60.9 days/year

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

38.8 per million

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.19 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.8%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST15th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

12 µg/L

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

36.5%

in the top 32% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US68th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Big Sandy, Texas (ZIP 75755) places in the bottom 16% nationally (26,829th) and the bottom 22% of Texas (1,463rd).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: mental-health providers rests in the top 4.6% nationally, and elder services resides in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled pfas is in the bottom 11.4% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled extreme heat lands in the top 7.2% nationally, industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 7.3% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk registers in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled mammography settles in the bottom 9.7% nationally, fatal road crashes sits in the top 11.3% nationally, and modeled humid heat lies in the top 11.9% nationally. Distance to an emergency room rests in the top 12.5% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 75494, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Longview, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.5 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $73,402 predicts 78.9 years — 2.3 years below.

    Ranked #3,195 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 38.8 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 76.5 ± 1.6 years.

    Ranked #1,644 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.7%27.5–34.5
High blood pressure among adults40.2%36.2–44.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–9.9
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.6–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%9.2–11.4
Depression among adults25.7%22.1–30.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.7%12.9–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.6%35.4–44.5
Obesity among adults38.0%30.4–47.4
Stroke among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.2%15.2–21.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.0%12.1–16.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%76.0–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.4%71.7–79.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.2–86.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.2%56.1–66.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.3%47.6–55.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.8%60.4–76.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.3–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.3%16.0–21.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.1%26.7–36.2
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%31.4–45.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.5%22.7–28.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.5–22.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.7%15.0–18.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.9%16.0–20.0
Any disability among adults37.8%33.5–42.8
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.1
Independent living disability among adults11.0%9.9–12.3
Mobility disability among adults19.2%17.1–21.7
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.9–5.9
Vision disability among adults6.7%6.1–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6429.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)18.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription93.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate79.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population4.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households44.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+14.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age38.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$73,402$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$109,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$897$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.5 yr ± 0.8078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.80 years of 76.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured