Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

75124

in Eustace, TexasPopulation 5,981

40.75/ 100

Ranked #26,230 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #1,400 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dry extreme heat

78.1 days/year

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

38.9 per million

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Eustace, Texas (ZIP 75124), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 18% nationally (26,230th) and the bottom 25% of Texas (1,400th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled radon lands in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled extreme heat stands in the top 5.2% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk registers in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled humid heat settles in the top 10.6% nationally, and crowded housing sits in the top 11.6% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 17% nationally. Recreation resides at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Slow internet speeds is in the top 18% nationally, and modeled mammography lands in the bottom 17% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 75103, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.9 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $79,083 predicts 79.2 years — 4.3 years below.

    Ranked #5,206 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.9 ± 1.7 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.5 years — 2.6 years below them.

    Ranked #2,005 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 38.9 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 74.9 ± 1.7 years.

    Ranked #1,631 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.0%29.1–35.2
High blood pressure among adults41.6%38.1–45.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.1–10.8
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%8.2–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.4%9.3–11.5
Depression among adults25.8%22.7–29.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%13.2–16.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.7%37.0–44.7
Obesity among adults36.1%29.5–43.5
Stroke among adults4.6%4.3–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.1%15.4–21.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.8%11.9–15.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%77.2–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.6%73.2–79.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.2–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.1%56.5–65.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.0%48.7–55.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.6%63.2–77.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.3–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.9%15.8–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.6%26.7–35.2
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%31.2–43.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.2%22.6–28.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.8%17.0–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults16.8%15.2–18.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%15.4–18.8
Any disability among adults37.8%34.1–42.0
Hearing disability among adults9.7%8.8–10.7
Independent living disability among adults10.6%9.6–11.8
Mobility disability among adults19.3%17.3–21.5
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.9–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6416.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)7.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle5.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription83.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate85.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population2.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households46.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+17.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age40.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$79,083$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$240,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,019$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.9 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 74.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured