Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

76272

in Valley View, TexasPopulation 5,335

50.21/ 100

Ranked #15,949 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #520 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dry extreme heat

82 days/year

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

35.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Valley View, Texas (ZIP 76272) ranks in the top 50% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,949th) and the top 28% of Texas (520th).

continue reading

Taken together, the profile's clearest strengths surface right away: modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 7.7% nationally, and elder services rests in the top 8.0% nationally. Modeled radon is in the bottom 6.4% nationally, and pfas stands in the bottom 15% nationally. Fiber broadband settles in the top 17% nationally. Against that, modeled extreme heat lies in the top 4.7% nationally, fatal road crashes resides in the top 9.2% nationally, and floodplain exposure lands in the top 11.7% nationally. Modeled humid heat registers in the top 16% nationally. Recreation sits at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 76233, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%23.6–30.2
High blood pressure among adults36.2%31.9–40.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.7–9.4
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.3–8.3
Depression among adults23.7%20.1–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.7–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.1%33.5–42.7
Obesity among adults35.9%27.5–44.7
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.0–12.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.7%11.8–15.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%73.7–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.1%71.1–78.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.4–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.0%59.7–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.7%58.0–65.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.0%64.7–80.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.6%14.4–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%12.2–16.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%21.3–30.3
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%30.2–44.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%17.8–23.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.2–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.4–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%12.9–16.4
Any disability among adults31.3%27.0–35.7
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.1
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Mobility disability among adults14.7%12.7–16.7
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.5–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6428.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)14.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription84.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate88.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population10.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households47.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+18.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age43.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$81,174$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$362,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$829$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured