Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

74750

in Millerton, OklahomaPopulation 170

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

35.38/ 100

Ranked #29,235 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.9%)

Ranked #478 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

13.7%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

6.0%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

25.4%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.5%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.5%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.1%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Millerton, Oklahoma (ZIP 74750) lands in the bottom 8.9% nationally (29,235th) and the bottom 25% of Oklahoma (478th).

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: modeled hearing disability is in the top 1.1% nationally, and loud transportation noise settles in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled mobility disability resides in the top 3.0% nationally, and coronary heart disease registers in the top 2.8% nationally. Modeled stroke rests in the top 4.7% nationally, and high blood pressure stands in the top 5.9% nationally. On the brighter side, floodplain exposure lies at the national minimum, modeled expected annual loss lands in the bottom 4.4% nationally, and modeled disaster risk sits in the bottom 4.4% nationally. Modeled binge drinking is in the bottom 4.6% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, loud transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 74728, about 2.8 miles away, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.5%34.7–42.1
High blood pressure among adults48.1%43.6–52.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.6%10.3–12.9
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.6–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults11.5%10.1–13.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.9%10.8–15.2
Depression among adults24.5%20.8–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.6%15.2–20.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.2%40.5–49.7
Obesity among adults40.2%32.3–48.0
Stroke among adults5.9%5.1–6.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.5%17.0–24.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.7%9.1–14.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.8%80.3–85.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%77.9–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%83.9–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.3%58.2–68.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.9%48.2–56.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.9%59.0–76.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.5%9.2–13.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.4%16.1–22.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.3%31.2–43.1
Short sleep duration among adults34.4%28.5–41.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.9%22.9–31.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.0–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults18.2%15.7–20.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.4%15.9–21.2
Any disability among adults46.7%41.1–52.1
Hearing disability among adults13.7%12.1–15.4
Independent living disability among adults12.1%10.3–14.0
Mobility disability among adults25.4%21.8–29.1
Self-care disability among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
Vision disability among adults8.0%6.8–9.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.5%20.5–28.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.3%15.8–23.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.2%14.0–20.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.5–14.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.3–11.4
Loneliness among adults32.6%27.1–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.1–11.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6419.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)22.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)7.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription81.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate81.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households39.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+23.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age40.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$38,333$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$66,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$900$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 1.2178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.21 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured