Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

95979

in Stonyford, CaliforniaPopulation 558

34.34/ 100

Ranked #29,606 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.7%)

Ranked #1,621 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 5.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Coronary heart disease

13.0%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.8%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

27.7%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.8%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

3.6%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

33.1%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.5%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.7%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.2%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People living in poverty
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Stonyford, California (ZIP 95979) sits in the bottom 7.7% nationally (29,606th) and the bottom 5.8% of California (1,621st).

continue reading

Here the data is straightforward about what defines the area: modeled coronary heart disease sits in the top 0.8% nationally, stroke stands in the top 1.6% nationally, and mobility disability resides in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled self-care disability sits in the top 3.3% nationally, fine-particle stands in the top 1.9% nationally, and fair or poor health resides in the top 4.2% nationally. Modeled hearing disability sits in the top 3.0% nationally, and independent living disability stands in the top 4.7% nationally. Modeled diabetes resides in the top 5.2% nationally, and disaster risk sits in the top 4.0% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 95939, just across the boundary. Across other measures, the ZIP also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.9%34.8–43.2
High blood pressure among adults48.1%43.3–52.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.6%11.4–13.9
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults13.0%11.6–14.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.1%12.0–16.3
Depression among adults23.9%20.5–27.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.2%16.6–21.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.9%40.2–49.9
Obesity among adults36.7%28.8–45.2
Stroke among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.5%15.9–23.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%7.0–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.1–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%74.6–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%87.0–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.0%56.2–67.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.3%54.4–62.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.4%62.5–79.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.3%10.0–14.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.2%16.1–22.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.1%27.6–38.4
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%26.2–39.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.1%28.6–37.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%15.9–20.1
Frequent physical distress among adults21.4%18.7–23.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.1%15.7–20.3
Any disability among adults45.6%40.1–50.6
Hearing disability among adults12.5%11.1–14.0
Independent living disability among adults13.7%11.8–15.4
Mobility disability among adults27.7%24.0–31.1
Self-care disability among adults7.8%6.8–8.9
Vision disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.0%22.0–30.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.8%17.4–24.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.2%20.4–28.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%11.9–16.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.2–12.2
Loneliness among adults33.0%27.7–38.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.6–10.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate32.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–648.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)10.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription90.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)43.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate56.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population4.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households78.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+47.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age64.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$24,766$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$184,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,296$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.9 yr ± 2.2478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.24 years of 83.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured