Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

74570

in Stuart, OklahomaPopulation 1,358

40.96/ 100

Ranked #26,064 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #275 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a nursing home

13.4 mi

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.3%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.2%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST56th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

51 days/year

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.4%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Stuart, Oklahoma (ZIP 74570) places in the bottom 19% nationally (26,064th) and the top 43% of Oklahoma (275th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled binge drinking is in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Pulling the other way, distance to a nursing home lands in the top 6.5% nationally, and modeled hearing disability stands in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the bottom 8.1% nationally, and extreme heat settles in the top 9.1% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription lies in the bottom 10.2% nationally, slow internet speeds rests in the top 10.8% nationally, and fatal road crashes resides in the top 13.9% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure is in the top 12.7% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 74531, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 68.7; chronic-disease standing 14.4 — 54 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,159 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.0%32.4–37.6
High blood pressure among adults44.9%41.8–48.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.5–11.0
Current asthma among adults12.0%11.0–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.4–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%9.1–11.4
Depression among adults25.2%22.6–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.9%13.5–16.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.7%39.4–45.8
Obesity among adults39.6%34.0–45.3
Stroke among adults4.6%4.3–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.9%15.4–20.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%8.2–10.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%78.4–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%78.5–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.9–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.9%57.9–65.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.5%54.5–60.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.2%61.7–74.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.4%10.8–14.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.6%16.4–20.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.0%29.2–36.9
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%33.1–42.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.8%20.4–25.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.8–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.8–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%15.2–18.5
Any disability among adults41.0%37.4–44.6
Hearing disability among adults11.3%10.3–12.3
Independent living disability among adults10.2%9.1–11.2
Mobility disability among adults20.6%18.5–22.7
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Vision disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.9%21.1–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.3%15.0–19.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.5–16.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%11.0–14.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.9–9.9
Loneliness among adults31.3%27.7–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.4–10.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6417.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)14.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle1.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription75.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate86.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households57.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+34.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age48.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$57,131$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$163,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$767$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 1.1978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.19 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured